Cheat sheet
CFE Certified Fraud Examiner Cheat Sheet
Fraud Schemes + Financial Crimes
- 39% of exam
- Fraud Tree Asset Misappropriation Corruption Financial Statement Fraud Red Flags + Ratios Money Laundering
Fraud Investigations + Legal Issues
- 39% of exam
- Evidence + Chain of Custody Interviewing Tracing + Hidden Assets Digital + Document Forensics Fraud Law + Statutes Evidence Law + Rights
Fraud Prevention + Deterrence
- 22% of exam
- Fraud Triangle + Theory COSO + Internal Controls Governance + Ethics Detection Methods Deterrence Code of Ethics
Quick Facts
- Exam CFE
- Credential Certified Fraud Examiner
- Questions 310 total
- Sections 120 + 120 + 70
- Time 2.5h + 2.5h + 1.5h
- Pass 75% each section
- Fee $480 application
- Delivery Prometric or remote
- Blueprint June 2 2026
Money Laundering Stages SC
- Placement -> Layering -> Integration
- Placement: cash enters Layering: obscure trail Integration: appears clean
Skimming vs Cash Larceny SC
Skimming
- Off-book theft
- Before recording
- No ledger trail
Cash larceny
- On-book theft
- After recording
- Deposit comes up short
- Before vs after books
Scheme Identifier SC
- Cash gone before recording → Skimming ( Off-book )
- Cash gone after recording → Cash larceny ( On-book )
- False invoice paid → Billing scheme
- Ghost worker paid → Payroll fraud
- Check altered or forged → Check tampering
- Revenue booked too early → Financial statement fraud
- Vendor pays buyer back → Kickback ( Corruption )
- Cash split under threshold → Structuring ( BSA crime )
Fraud Tree SC
- Fraud tree Three fraud branches ACFE
- Asset misappropriation Most common, least costly
- Corruption Bribery, conflicts
- Financial statement fraud Least common, costliest
- Occupational fraud Employee against employer
- Predication Reasonable basis to investigate
Fraud Tree Branches SC
- Corruption | Asset Misappropriation | Financial Statement
- Corruption: bribery, conflicts Asset misapp: most common Financial stmt: costliest
Bribery vs Illegal Gratuity SC
Bribery
- Before decision
- Quid pro quo
- Intends to influence
Illegal gratuity
- After the act
- Reward for decision
- No agreement required
- Influence vs reward
Asset Misappropriation SC
- Skimming Off-book cash theft
- Cash larceny On-book cash theft
- Billing scheme Shell or inflated invoices
- Payroll Ghost employees
- Check tampering Forged or altered checks
- Expense reimbursement Fake or inflated claims
- Register disbursement False refunds, voids
Corruption SC
- Bribery Pay to influence
- Kickback Vendor secret commission
- Illegal gratuity Reward after act
- Conflict of interest Undisclosed self-interest
- Economic extortion Demand under duress
- Bid rigging Collusive procurement
Financial Statement Fraud SC
- Revenue recognition Book revenue early
- Channel stuffing Excess period-end shipping
- Bill-and-hold Bill before delivery
- Fictitious revenue Fake sales, customers
- Timing differences Wrong-period recording
- Concealed liabilities Hide payables, expenses
- Improper disclosures Omit material facts
- Asset valuation Overstate asset values
Red Flags + Ratios SC
- Current ratio Short-term liquidity
- Quick ratio Acid-test liquidity
- Gross margin Sudden spikes suspicious
- Receivable turnover Collection speed
- Inventory turnover Stock movement speed
- Vertical analysis Percent of base
- Horizontal analysis Period-to-period change
Money Laundering SC
- Placement Cash enters system
- Layering Obscure the trail
- Integration Funds appear legitimate
- Structuring (smurfing) Split under threshold
- Trade-based Mis-invoiced trade value
- CTR Currency transaction report $10k
- SAR Suspicious activity report
- BSA Bank Secrecy Act
5 Interview Question Types IN
- Intro | Info | Assessment | Closing | Admission
- Intro: rapport Info: open then closed Assessment: test credibility Closing: reconcile Admission: confront guilty
Interview vs Interrogation IN
Interview
- Non-accusatory
- Fact-finding
- Open questions
Interrogation
- Accusatory
- Admission-seeking
- After evidence gathered
- Gather vs confront
Investigation Method Picker IN
- Prove hidden income → Net worth method
- Unknown income source → Bank deposits method
- Test digit patterns → Benford's Law
- Seized a computer → Forensic image ( Hash it )
- Confirm facts, non-accusatory → Interview
- Guilt already established → Admission-seeking interview
- Check document authenticity → Document exam
- Move evidence to court → Chain of custody
Evidence + Chain of Custody IN
- Chain of custody Unbroken handling trail
- Direct evidence Proves fact directly
- Circumstantial Inference required
- Documentary Records and papers
- Testimonial Witness statements
- Spoliation Destroying evidence
Criminal vs Civil IN
Criminal
- State prosecutes
- Beyond reasonable doubt
- Fines or prison
Civil
- Victim sues
- Preponderance of evidence
- Monetary recovery
- Punish vs recover
Interviewing IN
- Interview Non-accusatory fact-finding
- Interrogation Accusatory, admission-seeking
- Introductory Establish rapport
- Informational Open then closed
- Assessment Test credibility
- Closing Confirm, reconcile
- Admission-seeking Confront guilty subject
Direct vs Circumstantial IN
Direct
- Proves fact directly
- Eyewitness account
- No inference needed
Circumstantial
- Requires inference
- Indirect proof
- Can still convict
- Direct vs inferred
Tracing + Hidden Assets IN
- Net worth method Assets minus liabilities
- Asset method Track asset growth
- Expenditures method Spending versus income
- Bank deposits method Deposits versus income
- Direct method Specific transactions
- Lifestyle analysis Spending exceeds income
Digital + Document Forensics IN
- Forensic image Bit-for-bit copy
- Hash value Prove integrity
- Write blocker Prevent alteration
- Metadata Data about data
- Benford's Law Digit frequency test
- Preserve originals Analyze copies only
Fraud Law + Statutes IN
- Fraud elements Misrep, intent, reliance, damage
- Mail fraud 18 USC 1341
- Wire fraud 18 USC 1343
- RICO Pattern of racketeering
- SOX 404 Internal control report
- FCPA Foreign bribery ban
- Money laundering 18 USC 1956
Evidence Law + Rights IN
- Hearsay Out-of-court, for truth
- Business records Hearsay exception
- Attorney-client Privileged legal advice
- Work product Litigation materials protected
- Miranda Custody plus interrogation
- Fourth Amendment Government search limits
Fraud Triangle PR
- Pressure + Opportunity + Rationalization
- Pressure: motive or need Opportunity: control gap Rationalization: self-justification Diamond adds: capability
Preventive vs Detective PR
Preventive
- Stops before occurrence
- Segregation of duties
- Authorization limits
Detective
- Finds after occurrence
- Reconciliations
- Audits and reviews
- Before vs after
Control + Prevention Picker PR
- Stop fraud beforehand → Preventive control
- Catch fraud afterward → Detective control
- One person controls process → Segregate duties
- No fear of detection → Increase deterrence
- Need anonymous tips → Whistleblower hotline
- Set ethical example → Tone at the top
- Prioritize fraud exposures → Fraud risk assessment
Fraud Triangle + Theory PR
- Pressure Motive or need
- Opportunity Control gap
- Rationalization Self-justification
- Fraud diamond Adds capability
- Cressey Fraud triangle origin
- Tone at the top Leadership ethics example
COSO 5 Components PR
- Environment | Risk | Activities | Info | Monitoring
- CE: tone at top RA: identify risks CA: procedures IC: reporting M: ongoing checks
Fraud Triangle vs Diamond PR
Triangle
- Three elements
- Cressey's theory
- Pressure, opportunity, rationalization
Diamond
- Four elements
- Adds capability
- Skill to exploit
- Three vs four
COSO + Internal Controls PR
- Control environment Tone and integrity
- Risk assessment Identify fraud risks
- Control activities Policies and procedures
- Information + communication Reporting flows
- Monitoring Ongoing evaluation
- Segregation of duties Split key functions
- Preventive vs detective Stop versus find
Governance + Ethics PR
- Audit committee Independent board oversight
- Whistleblower hotline Confidential reporting channel
- ACFE Code of Ethics Member conduct rules
- No opinion of guilt Court decides guilt
- Fraud risk assessment Map schemes to controls
- Report to the Nations ACFE fraud study
Common Traps
Skimming vs Larceny
- Skimming = off-book ≠ Larceny = on-book
Bribery vs Gratuity
- Bribery = before act ≠ Gratuity = after act
Interview vs Interrogation
- Interview = fact-finding ≠ Interrogation = admission-seeking
Who decides guilt
- Examiner reports evidence ≠ Court decides guilt
Common vs Costly
- Asset misapp = frequent ≠ Financial statement = costliest
Miranda scope
- Private examiner exempt ≠ Law enforcement bound
Fraud vs Abuse
- Fraud = intentional deception ≠ Abuse = misuse, legal
Last Minute
- 1. Weights: 39, 39, 22 percent
- 2. Pass 75 percent each section
- 3. 310 questions, three sections
- 4. Skimming off-book; larceny on-book
- 5. Bribery before; gratuity after act
- 6. Interview finds facts; interrogation confronts
- 7. Triangle: pressure, opportunity, rationalization
- 8. Laundering: placement, layering, integration
- 9. COSO has five components
- 10. Examiner never opines on guilt
- 11. Net worth finds hidden income
- 12. Chain of custody stays unbroken
CFE
- Practice Questions 200 questions Study Guide 28 topics Cheat Sheet 99 facts Flashcards 50 cards Shorts 1 short Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog Free CE Podcast