Cheat sheet

PE Industrial and Systems Cheat Sheet

Practice this exam

Systems Engineering

  • Not published of exam
  • 14–21 items; percentages not fixed Markov, V&V, Value & CPM Systems & Queueing Picker Verification vs Validation

Facilities Engineering and Planning

  • Not published of exam
  • Layouts, Space & Location Material Handling, OSHA & Present Cost Facility Layout & Sizing Picker Process vs Fixed-Position Layout

Operations Engineering

  • Not published of exam
  • Forecasting, EOQ & Reorder Point MRP, Scheduling, Break-Even & ABC Inventory & Operations Picker EOQ vs Reorder Point

Work Design

  • Not published of exam
  • Methods, Line Balance & Time Study Ergonomics, OSHA Noise & Safety Work Design & Ergonomics Picker Anthropometric Reach vs Clearance

Quality Engineering

  • Not published of exam
  • SPC, Capability & Acceptance Sampling DOE, FMEA, Reliability & Maintenance Quality & Reliability Picker Control Limits vs Spec Limits

Quick Facts

  • Items 85, including unscored pretest items
  • Answering Time 8.5 hours; appointment 9.5 hours
  • Official Domain Counts 14–21 items in each of five
  • Passing Standard Unpublished scaled-score standard; pass/fail results
  • References Provided searchable handbook; no design standards
  • Next Listed Administration 30 September 2027; guide page 17
  • NCEES Exam Fee $400; board charges may apply
  • Eligibility Board decides; exam passage ≠ licensure
  • Percentage Weights Not fixed; use published item ranges

Little's Law Boundary Rule SY

  • Average WIP L equals throughput lambda times flow time W
  • L: average system inventory λ: stable throughput rate W: total time in system

Verification vs Validation SY

Verification

  • Meets specified design requirements
  • Checks built system against blueprint
  • Can pass while missing user-need

Validation

  • Satisfies real stakeholder operational needs
  • Tested in intended use environment
  • Confirms right system was built
  • Spec compliance vs stakeholder need

Systems & Queueing Model Picker SY

  • Independent Poisson arrivals; exponential service times → Steady-state single-server, infinite-buffer model ( λ < μ; stable FCFS system )
  • Throughput and flow time known → Little’s Law: L = λ × W ( Stable averages; same boundary and units )
  • Serial stations have unequal capacities → Smallest capacity gives ideal throughput ceiling ( Variability, starvation, blocking reduce achieved output )
  • Translating customer needs to specs → Build QFD House of Quality ( Voice of customer )
  • Checking ≤ constraint unused resource → Compute LP slack variable ( Zero means binding )

QFD, LP, Queueing & Little's Law SY

  • Pareto Chart Ranks largest contributors to problem
  • QFD House of Quality Translates customer voice to specs
  • LP Slack Nonnegative unused capacity for ≤ constraints
  • M/M/1 Mean Queue Wait Wq = λ÷[μ(μ−λ)] λ < μ; infinite-buffer, single-server
  • Little's Law Stable matching boundary: L = λW
  • Serial Line Bottleneck Ideal upper bound: smallest station capacity

Markov, V&V, Value & CPM SY

  • Markov Property Next state depends on present
  • System Verification Checks conformance to specified requirements
  • System Validation Checks stakeholder needs in use
  • Value Engineering Lower cost while preserving functions
  • Unconstrained CPM Duration Longest precedence path sets finish
  • Domain Question Range 14-21 questions per NCEES domain

Layouts, Space & Location FA

  • Process Layout Groups similar machines; low-volume high-variety
  • Fixed-Position Layout Stationary product; resources move in
  • Storage Footprint Pallet area plus aisle clearances
  • Center of Gravity Weighted coordinate heuristic; not universal optimum
  • Required Machine Count Ceil workload ÷ effective available machine-time
  • Weighted Site Score Sum weight times criterion score

Material Handling, OSHA & Present Cost FA

  • Forklift Load Center Forward center increases overturning moment
  • OSHA 1910.176 Aisle Rule Safe clearance, clear, marked passageways
  • Present Cost Discounting Discount future costs to base-date
  • Life-Cycle Costing Include capex, opex, maintenance, disposal
  • Handling Device Selection Match load, route, layout, conditions
  • Unit Load Stability Check weight, size, center position

Core MRP Inputs OP

  • Master Schedule, Bill of Materials, Inventory Records drive MRP
  • MPS: end-item timing BOM: component structure Inventory: on-hand and scheduled

Facility & Inventory Model Picker OP

  • Low-volume high-variety routing flexibility needed → Select functional process layout ( Group similar machines )
  • Product too large to move → Select fixed-position layout ( Bring tools to job )
  • Steady demand; instantaneous replenishment; no shortages → EOQ with fixed order/holding costs ( No discounts; matching demand/holding periods )
  • Setting continuous-review order trigger level → Add lead-time demand and safety-stock ( Use inventory position )
  • Stationary demand without trend/seasonality → Use simple exponential smoothing ( Weight actual and forecast )

Forecasting, EOQ & Reorder Point OP

  • Simple Exponential Smoothing F_next = αA_current + (1−α)F_current
  • Mean Absolute Deviation Average absolute forecast error magnitude
  • Basic EOQ Formula √(2DS/H); matching periods
  • Reorder Point Lead-time demand plus safety stock
  • Inventory Position On-hand plus on-order minus backorders
  • Cross-Docking Consolidate inbound-to-outbound with minimal storage

MRP, Scheduling, Break-Even & ABC OP

  • Core MRP Inputs MPS, BOM, and inventory records
  • SPT Sequencing Rule All released; nonpreemptive single-machine completion-time minimum
  • Break-Even Volume Fixed cost over unit contribution-margin
  • Ordinary Annuity PV Discount year-end cashflows to present
  • Activity-Based Costing Pool cost over total driver-units
  • Contribution Margin Unit price minus variable cost

Time Study Sequence WO

  • Observed × rating = normal; standard = normal/(1−A)
  • NT = OT × Rating ST = NT / (1-A) A: fraction of total time

Anthropometric Reach vs Clearance WO

Reach Design

  • Accommodates smaller-reach users
  • Uses lower-percentile limb dimensions
  • Keeps controls within easy grasp

Clearance Design

  • Accommodates larger-body users
  • Uses upper-percentile body dimensions
  • Includes clothing and gear allowance
  • Small reaches; large fits through

Work Design & Ergonomics Picker WO

  • Allowance given as total-time fraction → Divide normal time by 1-minus-A ( Not multiplied by 1+A )
  • Sizing minimum stations or machines → Round fractional count upward ( Check precedence separately )
  • 8-hour TWA noise hits 85 dBA → Start OSHA hearing conservation program ( 50% noise dose )
  • Computing OSHA DART incidence rate → Multiply cases by 200,000 hours ( Divide by employee-hours )

Methods, Line Balance & Time Study WO

  • Man-Machine Chart Shows concurrent work and idle-time
  • Theoretical Min Stations Ceiling of work-content over cycle-time
  • Normal Time Observed time times performance rating
  • Standard Time NT÷(1−A) A: allowance fraction of total time
  • Cumulative-Average Learning Doubling output multiplies average by r
  • Work-Sampling Plan n n = ceil[z²p(1−p)/e²]; independent samples

OSHA DART 200,000 Constant WO

  • 100 workers times 40 hours times 50 weeks equals 200,000
  • 100 FTE workers 2,000 hours per worker-year Count cases, not lost days

Ergonomics, OSHA Noise & Safety WO

  • NIOSH Lifting Index Load/RWL; applicable two-handed lifting tasks
  • Anthropometric Reach Rule Design reach for small-stature users
  • Anthropometric Clearance Rule Design clearance for large-stature users
  • OSHA 1910.95 Action Level 85 dBA 8-hour TWA, 50% dose
  • DART Incidence Rate DART cases × 200,000 ÷ employee-hours
  • Keyed Connector Poka-Yoke Physical design prevents wrong orientation

Control Limits vs Specification Limits QU

Control Limits

  • Calculated from process data
  • Detect statistical special-cause signals
  • Represent voice of the process

Specification Limits

  • Set by engineering or customer
  • Define acceptable unit conformance
  • Not estimated from process subgroup sigma
  • Stability signal vs product tolerance

Quality & Reliability Picker QU

  • Stable approximately normal, two-sided process capability → Cpk includes mean location and spread ( Signed distance; negative outside specification limits )
  • Monitoring fraction nonconforming across subgroups → Use binomial 3-sigma p-chart ( Independent Bernoulli items; n-specific limits )
  • Constant failure rate lambda given → R(t) = exp(−λt) ( Memoryless hazard rate )
  • Degradation sensor indicator is available → Use condition-based predictive maintenance ( Instead of fixed calendar )

SPC, Capability & Acceptance Sampling QU

  • Control vs Spec Limits Process voice vs customer requirements
  • p-Chart 3-Sigma UCL p̄ + 3√[p̄(1−p̄)/n] Upper bound: 1
  • Process Capability Cp (USL−LSL)÷(6σ) Stable, approximately normal process
  • Two-Sided Capability Cpk min[USL−mean, mean−LSL]/(3σ); signed distances
  • Producer Risk Alpha Rejecting good lot at AQL
  • Consumer Risk Beta Accepting poor lot at LTPD

Cp vs Cpk Capability QU

Cp Index

  • Equals USL-minus-LSL over 6-sigma
  • Measures centered potential capability
  • Ignores process mean location

Cpk Index

  • Uses smaller signed specification distance
  • Penalizes off-center process mean
  • Equals Cp only when centered
  • Stable-process spread vs centering effect

DOE, FMEA, Reliability & Maintenance QU

  • Factorial Interaction Factor effect depends on another
  • ISO 9001 Scope Quality management system process requirements
  • Proactive FMEA Goal Anticipate failure modes, causes, effects
  • Exponential Reliability Surviving interval under constant hazard
  • Predictive Maintenance Triggered by measured condition degradation
  • Evidence-Based Root Cause Verify causal links with data

Producer's Risk α vs Consumer's Risk β QU

Producer's Risk (α)

  • Type I sampling error
  • Rejecting good lot at AQL
  • Hurts compliant supplier

Consumer's Risk (β)

  • Type II sampling error
  • Accepting bad lot at LTPD
  • Passes poor quality to buyer
  • Reject AQL vs accept LTPD

Predictive vs Preventive Maintenance QU

Predictive Maintenance

  • Driven by measured equipment condition
  • Tracks vibration, heat, or wear
  • Intervenes before detected degradation fails

Preventive Maintenance

  • Driven by calendar or run-hours
  • Fixed schedule regardless of condition
  • Suited for predictable wear-out
  • Condition sensor vs fixed clock

Common Traps

MAD vs Signed Mean Forecast Error

  • MAD: average absolute error magnitude ≠ Signed mean error: cancellation exposes bias

Reorder Point vs Order Quantity

  • ROP: when inventory position triggers replenishment ≠ EOQ: how much each order contains

Two Different Allowance Denominators

  • Fraction of standard time: NT/(1−A) ≠ Normal-time allowance: NT×(1+A)

DART Cases vs Lost Workdays

  • DART numerator: qualifying injury/illness cases ≠ Lost-day total: duration, not case count

OSHA Noise Action vs Permissible Exposure

  • 85 dBA eight-hour TWA: conservation action ≠ 90 dBA eight-hour exposure: permissible limit

Active Specification vs Research Survey

  • Linked specification: effective October 2020 ≠ 2026 PAKS survey: future-update research

Last Minute

  • 1. 85 items; 8.5 h answering time
  • 2. Five domains: 14–21 items each
  • 3. Wrong answers: no deduction
  • 4. Alternative items: no partial credit
  • 5. Provided handbook; no design standards
  • 6. M/M/1 Wq: λ÷(μ²−μλ)
  • 7. M/M/1 stable: λ<μ
  • 8. Stable Little’s Law: L = λW
  • 9. EOQ: √[2DS/H]; matching periods
  • 10. ROP: lead-time demand plus safety stock
  • 11. Total-time allowance: ST = NT/(1−A)
  • 12. Two-handed lifting: LI = load÷RWL
  • 13. Noise conservation: 85 dBA, eight-hour TWA
  • 14. Cpk: minimum signed distance ÷ 3σ

PE Industrial and Systems

  • Practice Questions 200 questions Study Guide 53 topics Cheat Sheet 60 facts Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 1 short Free CE Podcast
  • Word games 20 terms Guess the Term T E R M S Read the clue and guess the term in 6 tries. Word games 20 terms Term Match Swap tiles to line up three of the same term. Word games 20 terms Term Pairs ? ✓ ✓ ? ? Flip two cards at a time to find matching terms. Word games 20 terms Term Search Q T E R M X Find five hidden terms in a grid of letters.

Same family resources

  • Explore More PE Exams
  • Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.

PE Mechanical

  • Practice Questions 208 questions Study Guide 39 topics Shorts 3 short s Videos 2 videos Blogs 3 blogs Free CE

PE Civil

  • Cheat Sheet 80 facts Practice Questions 228 questions Study Guide 26 topics Flashcards 50 cards Shorts 2 short s Videos 2 videos Blogs 2 blogs 1 Job Wiki Free CE

PE Electrical and Computer

  • Practice Questions 225 questions Study Guide 51 topics Shorts 1 short Videos 2 videos Blogs 2 blogs Free CE

PE Environmental

  • Cheat Sheet 92 facts Practice Questions 302 questions Study Guide 30 topics Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 1 short Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog 1 Job Wiki Free CE

PE Chemical

  • Practice Questions 210 questions Study Guide 68 topics Shorts 2 short s Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog Free CE

PE Civil: Construction

  • Cheat Sheet 88 facts Practice Questions 200 questions Study Guide 48 topics Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 3 short s Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog 1 Job Wiki Free CE

More From This Family

  • Videos and articles for deeper review.
  • Video Best Calculators for the PE Exam 2026: All NCEES-Approved Models Compared Video FE Exam Study Guide 2026: Pass Rates by Discipline Video PE Civil Geotechnical Exam Guide 2026 Video PE Civil WRE Exam Guide 2026: 12 Domains and Study Plan Article FREE PE Control Systems Exam Guide 2026: Pass NCEES CSE First Try 16 min read Article FE Exam Study Guide 2026: Pass Rates by Discipline 18 min read Article PE Civil Geotechnical Exam Guide 2026 17 min read Article PE Civil WRE Exam Guide 2026: 12 Domains and Study Plan 18 min read