Cheat sheet
PE Industrial and Systems Cheat Sheet
Systems Engineering
- Not published of exam
- 14–21 items; percentages not fixed Markov, V&V, Value & CPM Systems & Queueing Picker Verification vs Validation
Facilities Engineering and Planning
- Not published of exam
- Layouts, Space & Location Material Handling, OSHA & Present Cost Facility Layout & Sizing Picker Process vs Fixed-Position Layout
Operations Engineering
- Not published of exam
- Forecasting, EOQ & Reorder Point MRP, Scheduling, Break-Even & ABC Inventory & Operations Picker EOQ vs Reorder Point
Work Design
- Not published of exam
- Methods, Line Balance & Time Study Ergonomics, OSHA Noise & Safety Work Design & Ergonomics Picker Anthropometric Reach vs Clearance
Quality Engineering
- Not published of exam
- SPC, Capability & Acceptance Sampling DOE, FMEA, Reliability & Maintenance Quality & Reliability Picker Control Limits vs Spec Limits
Quick Facts
- Items 85, including unscored pretest items
- Answering Time 8.5 hours; appointment 9.5 hours
- Official Domain Counts 14–21 items in each of five
- Passing Standard Unpublished scaled-score standard; pass/fail results
- References Provided searchable handbook; no design standards
- Next Listed Administration 30 September 2027; guide page 17
- NCEES Exam Fee $400; board charges may apply
- Eligibility Board decides; exam passage ≠ licensure
- Percentage Weights Not fixed; use published item ranges
Little's Law Boundary Rule SY
- Average WIP L equals throughput lambda times flow time W
- L: average system inventory λ: stable throughput rate W: total time in system
Verification vs Validation SY
Verification
- Meets specified design requirements
- Checks built system against blueprint
- Can pass while missing user-need
Validation
- Satisfies real stakeholder operational needs
- Tested in intended use environment
- Confirms right system was built
- Spec compliance vs stakeholder need
Systems & Queueing Model Picker SY
- Independent Poisson arrivals; exponential service times → Steady-state single-server, infinite-buffer model ( λ < μ; stable FCFS system )
- Throughput and flow time known → Little’s Law: L = λ × W ( Stable averages; same boundary and units )
- Serial stations have unequal capacities → Smallest capacity gives ideal throughput ceiling ( Variability, starvation, blocking reduce achieved output )
- Translating customer needs to specs → Build QFD House of Quality ( Voice of customer )
- Checking ≤ constraint unused resource → Compute LP slack variable ( Zero means binding )
QFD, LP, Queueing & Little's Law SY
- Pareto Chart Ranks largest contributors to problem
- QFD House of Quality Translates customer voice to specs
- LP Slack Nonnegative unused capacity for ≤ constraints
- M/M/1 Mean Queue Wait Wq = λ÷[μ(μ−λ)] λ < μ; infinite-buffer, single-server
- Little's Law Stable matching boundary: L = λW
- Serial Line Bottleneck Ideal upper bound: smallest station capacity
Markov, V&V, Value & CPM SY
- Markov Property Next state depends on present
- System Verification Checks conformance to specified requirements
- System Validation Checks stakeholder needs in use
- Value Engineering Lower cost while preserving functions
- Unconstrained CPM Duration Longest precedence path sets finish
- Domain Question Range 14-21 questions per NCEES domain
Layouts, Space & Location FA
- Process Layout Groups similar machines; low-volume high-variety
- Fixed-Position Layout Stationary product; resources move in
- Storage Footprint Pallet area plus aisle clearances
- Center of Gravity Weighted coordinate heuristic; not universal optimum
- Required Machine Count Ceil workload ÷ effective available machine-time
- Weighted Site Score Sum weight times criterion score
Material Handling, OSHA & Present Cost FA
- Forklift Load Center Forward center increases overturning moment
- OSHA 1910.176 Aisle Rule Safe clearance, clear, marked passageways
- Present Cost Discounting Discount future costs to base-date
- Life-Cycle Costing Include capex, opex, maintenance, disposal
- Handling Device Selection Match load, route, layout, conditions
- Unit Load Stability Check weight, size, center position
Core MRP Inputs OP
- Master Schedule, Bill of Materials, Inventory Records drive MRP
- MPS: end-item timing BOM: component structure Inventory: on-hand and scheduled
Facility & Inventory Model Picker OP
- Low-volume high-variety routing flexibility needed → Select functional process layout ( Group similar machines )
- Product too large to move → Select fixed-position layout ( Bring tools to job )
- Steady demand; instantaneous replenishment; no shortages → EOQ with fixed order/holding costs ( No discounts; matching demand/holding periods )
- Setting continuous-review order trigger level → Add lead-time demand and safety-stock ( Use inventory position )
- Stationary demand without trend/seasonality → Use simple exponential smoothing ( Weight actual and forecast )
Forecasting, EOQ & Reorder Point OP
- Simple Exponential Smoothing F_next = αA_current + (1−α)F_current
- Mean Absolute Deviation Average absolute forecast error magnitude
- Basic EOQ Formula √(2DS/H); matching periods
- Reorder Point Lead-time demand plus safety stock
- Inventory Position On-hand plus on-order minus backorders
- Cross-Docking Consolidate inbound-to-outbound with minimal storage
MRP, Scheduling, Break-Even & ABC OP
- Core MRP Inputs MPS, BOM, and inventory records
- SPT Sequencing Rule All released; nonpreemptive single-machine completion-time minimum
- Break-Even Volume Fixed cost over unit contribution-margin
- Ordinary Annuity PV Discount year-end cashflows to present
- Activity-Based Costing Pool cost over total driver-units
- Contribution Margin Unit price minus variable cost
Time Study Sequence WO
- Observed × rating = normal; standard = normal/(1−A)
- NT = OT × Rating ST = NT / (1-A) A: fraction of total time
Anthropometric Reach vs Clearance WO
Reach Design
- Accommodates smaller-reach users
- Uses lower-percentile limb dimensions
- Keeps controls within easy grasp
Clearance Design
- Accommodates larger-body users
- Uses upper-percentile body dimensions
- Includes clothing and gear allowance
- Small reaches; large fits through
Work Design & Ergonomics Picker WO
- Allowance given as total-time fraction → Divide normal time by 1-minus-A ( Not multiplied by 1+A )
- Sizing minimum stations or machines → Round fractional count upward ( Check precedence separately )
- 8-hour TWA noise hits 85 dBA → Start OSHA hearing conservation program ( 50% noise dose )
- Computing OSHA DART incidence rate → Multiply cases by 200,000 hours ( Divide by employee-hours )
Methods, Line Balance & Time Study WO
- Man-Machine Chart Shows concurrent work and idle-time
- Theoretical Min Stations Ceiling of work-content over cycle-time
- Normal Time Observed time times performance rating
- Standard Time NT÷(1−A) A: allowance fraction of total time
- Cumulative-Average Learning Doubling output multiplies average by r
- Work-Sampling Plan n n = ceil[z²p(1−p)/e²]; independent samples
OSHA DART 200,000 Constant WO
- 100 workers times 40 hours times 50 weeks equals 200,000
- 100 FTE workers 2,000 hours per worker-year Count cases, not lost days
Ergonomics, OSHA Noise & Safety WO
- NIOSH Lifting Index Load/RWL; applicable two-handed lifting tasks
- Anthropometric Reach Rule Design reach for small-stature users
- Anthropometric Clearance Rule Design clearance for large-stature users
- OSHA 1910.95 Action Level 85 dBA 8-hour TWA, 50% dose
- DART Incidence Rate DART cases × 200,000 ÷ employee-hours
- Keyed Connector Poka-Yoke Physical design prevents wrong orientation
Control Limits vs Specification Limits QU
Control Limits
- Calculated from process data
- Detect statistical special-cause signals
- Represent voice of the process
Specification Limits
- Set by engineering or customer
- Define acceptable unit conformance
- Not estimated from process subgroup sigma
- Stability signal vs product tolerance
Quality & Reliability Picker QU
- Stable approximately normal, two-sided process capability → Cpk includes mean location and spread ( Signed distance; negative outside specification limits )
- Monitoring fraction nonconforming across subgroups → Use binomial 3-sigma p-chart ( Independent Bernoulli items; n-specific limits )
- Constant failure rate lambda given → R(t) = exp(−λt) ( Memoryless hazard rate )
- Degradation sensor indicator is available → Use condition-based predictive maintenance ( Instead of fixed calendar )
SPC, Capability & Acceptance Sampling QU
- Control vs Spec Limits Process voice vs customer requirements
- p-Chart 3-Sigma UCL p̄ + 3√[p̄(1−p̄)/n] Upper bound: 1
- Process Capability Cp (USL−LSL)÷(6σ) Stable, approximately normal process
- Two-Sided Capability Cpk min[USL−mean, mean−LSL]/(3σ); signed distances
- Producer Risk Alpha Rejecting good lot at AQL
- Consumer Risk Beta Accepting poor lot at LTPD
Cp vs Cpk Capability QU
Cp Index
- Equals USL-minus-LSL over 6-sigma
- Measures centered potential capability
- Ignores process mean location
Cpk Index
- Uses smaller signed specification distance
- Penalizes off-center process mean
- Equals Cp only when centered
- Stable-process spread vs centering effect
DOE, FMEA, Reliability & Maintenance QU
- Factorial Interaction Factor effect depends on another
- ISO 9001 Scope Quality management system process requirements
- Proactive FMEA Goal Anticipate failure modes, causes, effects
- Exponential Reliability Surviving interval under constant hazard
- Predictive Maintenance Triggered by measured condition degradation
- Evidence-Based Root Cause Verify causal links with data
Producer's Risk α vs Consumer's Risk β QU
Producer's Risk (α)
- Type I sampling error
- Rejecting good lot at AQL
- Hurts compliant supplier
Consumer's Risk (β)
- Type II sampling error
- Accepting bad lot at LTPD
- Passes poor quality to buyer
- Reject AQL vs accept LTPD
Predictive vs Preventive Maintenance QU
Predictive Maintenance
- Driven by measured equipment condition
- Tracks vibration, heat, or wear
- Intervenes before detected degradation fails
Preventive Maintenance
- Driven by calendar or run-hours
- Fixed schedule regardless of condition
- Suited for predictable wear-out
- Condition sensor vs fixed clock
Common Traps
MAD vs Signed Mean Forecast Error
- MAD: average absolute error magnitude ≠ Signed mean error: cancellation exposes bias
Reorder Point vs Order Quantity
- ROP: when inventory position triggers replenishment ≠ EOQ: how much each order contains
Two Different Allowance Denominators
- Fraction of standard time: NT/(1−A) ≠ Normal-time allowance: NT×(1+A)
DART Cases vs Lost Workdays
- DART numerator: qualifying injury/illness cases ≠ Lost-day total: duration, not case count
OSHA Noise Action vs Permissible Exposure
- 85 dBA eight-hour TWA: conservation action ≠ 90 dBA eight-hour exposure: permissible limit
Active Specification vs Research Survey
- Linked specification: effective October 2020 ≠ 2026 PAKS survey: future-update research
Last Minute
- 1. 85 items; 8.5 h answering time
- 2. Five domains: 14–21 items each
- 3. Wrong answers: no deduction
- 4. Alternative items: no partial credit
- 5. Provided handbook; no design standards
- 6. M/M/1 Wq: λ÷(μ²−μλ)
- 7. M/M/1 stable: λ<μ
- 8. Stable Little’s Law: L = λW
- 9. EOQ: √[2DS/H]; matching periods
- 10. ROP: lead-time demand plus safety stock
- 11. Total-time allowance: ST = NT/(1−A)
- 12. Two-handed lifting: LI = load÷RWL
- 13. Noise conservation: 85 dBA, eight-hour TWA
- 14. Cpk: minimum signed distance ÷ 3σ
PE Industrial and Systems
- Practice Questions 200 questions Study Guide 53 topics Cheat Sheet 60 facts Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 1 short Free CE Podcast
- Word games 20 terms Guess the Term T E R M S Read the clue and guess the term in 6 tries. Word games 20 terms Term Match Swap tiles to line up three of the same term. Word games 20 terms Term Pairs ? ✓ ✓ ? ? Flip two cards at a time to find matching terms. Word games 20 terms Term Search Q T E R M X Find five hidden terms in a grid of letters.
Same family resources
- Explore More PE Exams
- Continue into nearby exams from the same family. Each card keeps practice questions, study guides, flashcards, videos, and articles in one place.
PE Mechanical
- Practice Questions 208 questions Study Guide 39 topics Shorts 3 short s Videos 2 videos Blogs 3 blogs Free CE
PE Civil
- Cheat Sheet 80 facts Practice Questions 228 questions Study Guide 26 topics Flashcards 50 cards Shorts 2 short s Videos 2 videos Blogs 2 blogs 1 Job Wiki Free CE
PE Electrical and Computer
- Practice Questions 225 questions Study Guide 51 topics Shorts 1 short Videos 2 videos Blogs 2 blogs Free CE
PE Environmental
- Cheat Sheet 92 facts Practice Questions 302 questions Study Guide 30 topics Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 1 short Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog 1 Job Wiki Free CE
PE Chemical
- Practice Questions 210 questions Study Guide 68 topics Shorts 2 short s Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog Free CE
PE Civil: Construction
- Cheat Sheet 88 facts Practice Questions 200 questions Study Guide 48 topics Flashcards 50 cards Games 20 terms Shorts 3 short s Videos 1 video Blogs 1 blog 1 Job Wiki Free CE
More From This Family
- Videos and articles for deeper review.
- Video Best Calculators for the PE Exam 2026: All NCEES-Approved Models Compared Video FE Exam Study Guide 2026: Pass Rates by Discipline Video PE Civil Geotechnical Exam Guide 2026 Video PE Civil WRE Exam Guide 2026: 12 Domains and Study Plan Article FREE PE Control Systems Exam Guide 2026: Pass NCEES CSE First Try 16 min read Article FE Exam Study Guide 2026: Pass Rates by Discipline 18 min read Article PE Civil Geotechnical Exam Guide 2026 17 min read Article PE Civil WRE Exam Guide 2026: 12 Domains and Study Plan 18 min read