11.2 Comparative Analysis: Runout vs. Form, Orientation, & Concentricity Controls

ASME GDTP Technologist Y14.5-2009

Track your progress as you read

Finished sections get a check mark.

1 Chapter 1: Scope, Certification Logistics, Fundamental Rules & General Dimensioning

1.1 ASME GDTP Technologist Exam Scope, Prometric Logistics, & Certification Rules 1.2 Fundamental Rules of ASME Y14.5-2009 (Rules a through p) 1.3 Engineering Drawing Standards, Drawing Units, & Basic vs. Toleranced Dimensions 1.4 Dimensioning Features: Diameters, Radii, Chamfers, Countersinks, Counterbores, Spotfaces, Keyseats & Slots 1.5 Application of Dimensions & Location of Features: Lines, Leaders, Reference Dimensions, Rectangular vs. Polar Coordinates

2 Chapter 2: Features, Limits of Size, & Material Condition Principles

2.1 Features, Features of Size, & Limits of Size 2.2 Rule #1 (Taylor Principle / Envelope Rule), Its Exceptions & Overrides 2.3 Material Condition Concepts: MMC, LMC, & RFS Calculations

3 Chapter 3: General Tolerancing & Symbology

3.1 Direct Tolerancing, Limit Dimensioning, & Angular Tolerancing 3.2 The 14 Geometric Characteristic Symbols, Feature Control Frames, & Special Modifiers 3.3 Screw Threads, Gears & Splines, Angular Surfaces, Tapers & Statistical Tolerancing 3.4 Feature Control Frame Placement, Combined Frames, Tolerance Zone Definition & Tabulated Tolerances

4 Chapter 4: Datum Reference Frames & Degrees of Freedom

4.1 Theoretical Datums, Datum Feature Simulators, & Physical Datum Features 4.2 Degrees of Freedom Constraint & The 3-2-1 Datum Precedence System 4.3 Planar, Cylindrical, & Width Datum Feature Establishment

5 Chapter 5: Advanced Datum Applications: Targets, Boundary Modifiers, Customized Frames & Restrained Condition

5.1 Datum Target Points, Lines, Areas, & Movable Datum Simulators 5.2 Material Boundary Modifiers (RMB, MMB, LMB) & Datum Shift Calculations 5.3 Functional Datum Feature Selection, Multiple Datum Reference Frames & Simultaneous vs. Separate Requirements 5.4 Rotational Constraint About a Datum Axis or Point & Customized Datum Reference Frames 5.5 Irregular & Complex Datum Features, Mathematically Defined Surfaces, Restrained Condition & Datum Feature Controls

6 Chapter 6: Form Tolerances

6.1 Flatness & Straightness Controls for Surfaces & Features of Size 6.2 Circularity & Cylindricity Controls, Differences, & Inspection

7 Chapter 7: Orientation Tolerances

7.1 Parallelism Controls for Planar Surfaces & Cylindrical Features of Size 7.2 Perpendicularity & Angularity Tolerances with Basic Angles & Tangent Plane

8 Chapter 8: Location: Position Fundamentals & Calculations

8.1 Position Tolerancing Fundamentals, True Position, & Coordinate Conversions 8.2 Bonus Tolerance & Virtual Condition Calculations for Internal & External Features 8.3 Projected Tolerance Zones (Ⓟ Modifier) & Fixed vs. Floating Fastener Formulas 8.4 Zero Positional and Orientation Tolerancing at MMC and at LMC 8.5 Surface vs. Axis Interpretation of Position & the Boundary Concept for Slots, Tabs & Noncircular Features

9 Chapter 9: Location: Patterns, Composite Controls, Coaxial & Symmetrical Relationships, and Functional Gaging

9.1 Hole & Slot Patterns, Multi-Segment Frames, & Composite Position Tolerancing 9.2 Functional Gaging Principles & Inspection Verification of Position 9.3 Coaxial Holes, Counterbored Holes, Non-Parallel Axes, Spherical Features & Bidirectional Position 9.4 Concentricity & Symmetry Tolerances Under ASME Y14.5-2009 9.5 LMC Applied to Position: Wall Thickness, Breakout Protection & Boundary Calculations

10 Chapter 10: Profile Tolerances

10.1 Profile of a Line & Profile of a Surface Fundamentals & Basic Geometry 10.2 Bilateral, Unilateral, & Unequally Disposed Profile Boundaries (Ⓤ Modifier) 10.3 Composite Profile Tolerances vs. Multiple Single-Segment Profile Controls 10.4 Profile Verification, Coplanarity Controls, & Non-Rigid Parts 10.5 Profile Applications: Conicity, Extruded and Irregular Shapes, and Profile-Controlled Datum Features 10.6 Modifier Rules for Profile & Combined Controls (Profile with Position, Orientation and Runout)

11 Chapter 11: Runout Tolerances & Comparative Control Analysis

11.1 Circular Runout vs. Total Runout Interpretation & Dial Indicator Verification 11.2 Comparative Analysis: Runout vs. Form, Orientation, & Concentricity Controls

11.2 Comparative Analysis: Runout vs. Form, Orientation, & Concentricity Controls

Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI

Circularity (○) and Cylindricity (⌭) are pure form tolerances that are strictly datum-free; runout tolerances always require an established datum axis and control coaxiality and eccentricity in addition to surface form.

Concentricity (ASME Y14.5-2009 Section 7.6.4) controls the derived median points of diametrically opposed elements; it ignores surface lobing and requires complex CMM differential measurement, whereas runout directly controls the actual physical surface using a dial indicator.

Coaxial position at Maximum Material Condition (Ⓜ) allows bonus tolerance, datum shift, and functional receiver gaging; runout applies strictly at RFS, provides zero bonus tolerance, and requires rotational indicator inspection.

Total runout is an all-inclusive composite surface control: a cylindrical feature conforming to total runout t t t automatically satisfies circularity, surface straightness, taper, and coaxiality within t t t .

For high-speed rotating machinery (turbines, spindles, drive shafts), runout is preferred over concentricity or position because dynamic balance and bearing longevity depend on actual surface envelope wobble rather than theoretical centerlines.

Last updated: September 2026

11.2 Comparative Analysis: Runout vs. Form, Orientation, & Concentricity Controls

Quick Answer: Under ASME Y14.5-2009 , choosing the correct geometric control for coaxial and cylindrical features requires understanding the fundamental divide between datum-free form controls , derived centerline location controls , and composite surface runout controls . Circularity (○) and Cylindricity (⌭) control surface form only and cannot reference datums . Concentricity (◎) governs the location of derived median points of diametrically opposed elements relative to a datum axis; it is insensitive to surface lobing and requires complex CMM differential point measurement. Coaxial Position (⌖) governs the feature's Actual Mating Envelope axis and permits the Maximum Material Condition (Ⓜ) modifier for bonus tolerance and functional hard gaging. Runout (↗ and ⌰) directly controls the actual physical surface relative to a datum axis at Regardless of Feature Size (RFS) using dial indicator metrology. For high-speed rotating machinery, runout is the industry benchmark.

The Geometric Control Hierarchy for Cylindrical Features

Design engineers often struggle when selecting among the various GD&T controls available for cylindrical features of size. The controls form a structured hierarchy progressing from isolated surface form up to comprehensive composite location and form: GEOMETRIC CONTROL SPECTRUM FOR CYLINDERS

PURE FORM (Datum-Free) DERIVED AXIS / CENTER COMPOSITE SURFACE (RFS)
┌────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────┐
│ CIRCULARITY (○) │ │ POSITION (⌖) │ │CIRCULAR RUNOUT (↗) │
│ 2D cross-section │ │ Controls AME axis │ │ Controls 2D slice │
│ form only │ │ Allows MMC (Ⓜ) │ │ form + eccentricity│
├────────────────────┤ ├────────────────────┤ ├────────────────────┤
│ CYLINDRICITY (⌭) │ │ CONCENTRICITY (◎) │ │ TOTAL RUNOUT (⌰) │
│ 3D full surface │ │ Controls derived │ │ Controls 3D form + │
│ envelope form │ │ median points (RFS)│ │ taper + coaxiality │
└────────────────────┘ └────────────────────┘ └────────────────────┘

Understanding how these controls interact prevents two major engineering mistakes: under-controlling a feature (resulting in catastrophic functional assembly or dynamic vibration failure) and over-controlling a feature (inflating manufacturing costs with unnecessary precision requirements).

Runout vs. Pure Form Controls: Circularity & Cylindricity

Form tolerances govern the shape of a feature without regard to any external reference frame. They are strictly datum-free .

1. Runout vs. Circularity (ASME Y14.5-2009 Section 5.4.3)

Circularity (○) : Circularity is a two-dimensional form control that limits out-of-roundness (ovality, lobing, waviness) within individual cross-sections perpendicular to the feature axis. The tolerance zone consists of two concentric coplanar circles spaced radially by t t t . Circularity never references a datum. It cannot control feature location, coaxiality, or eccentricity.

Circular Runout (↗) : Circular runout controls circularity plus eccentricity/coaxiality relative to an established datum axis. The tolerance zone consists of two concentric circles centered on the datum axis .

Mathematical Relationship : A feature's circularity error can never exceed its circular runout error: Error circularity ≤ Error circular runout \text{Error}_{\text{circularity}} \le \text{Error}_{\text{circular runout}} Error circularity ≤ Error circular runout

Drawing Rule : If both controls are applied to the same feature, the circularity tolerance value must always be tighter (smaller) than the circular runout tolerance value ( t circularity < t circular runout t_{\text{circularity}} < t_{\text{circular runout}} t circularity < t circular runout ). Specifying a circularity tolerance equal to or larger than circular runout is completely redundant.

2. Runout vs. Cylindricity (ASME Y14.5-2009 Section 5.4.4)

Cylindricity (⌭) : Cylindricity is a three-dimensional form control that simultaneously limits circularity, straightness of surface elements, and taper (parallelism of opposite elements). The tolerance zone consists of two coaxial cylinders spaced radially by t t t . Like circularity, cylindricity is strictly datum-free .

Total Runout (⌰) : Total runout controls all the form elements of cylindricity (circularity, straightness, taper) plus coaxiality and angular orientation relative to the datum axis.

Mathematical Relationship : Cylindricity error can never exceed total runout error: Error cylindricity ≤ Error total runout \text{Error}_{\text{cylindricity}} \le \text{Error}_{\text{total runout}} Error cylindricity ≤ Error total runout

Critical Exam Distinction : A cylinder can have near-perfect cylindricity while being completely eccentric or skewed relative to the shaft's datum axis. For example, a sleeve pressed onto a shaft off-center can be perfectly round, straight, and untapered (passing cylindricity of 0.01 mm 0.01\text{ mm} 0.01 mm ), yet whip violently during rotation because its axis is offset by 0.50 mm 0.50\text{ mm} 0.50 mm from the datum axis (failing total runout).

Runout vs. Concentricity: The Median Point Dilemma (Section 7.6.4)

The distinction between Runout and Concentricity is one of the most notoriously misunderstood concepts in geometric dimensioning and tolerancing. CONCENTRICITY vs. RUNOUT: THE LOBING DILEMMA

CONCENTRICITY (ASME Section 7.6.4) RUNOUT (ASME Section 9)
┌────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Controls DERIVED MEDIAN POINTS │ │ Controls ACTUAL PHYSICAL SURFACE │
│ │ │ │
│ ▲ Point A │ │ Dial Indicator │
│ / \ │ │ ┌───┐ │
│ / • Midpoint │ │ │(D)│ │
│ / \ │ │ └───┘ │
│ ▼ Point B │ │ │ │
│ │ │ ▼ │
│ • Three-lobed part has median │ │ • Indicator needle deflects with │
│ points centered on datum axis │ │ every lobe and surface wave │
│ • PASSES Concentricity! │ │ • REJECTS lobed part immediately! │
│ • Fails in high-speed bearing! │ │ • Protects bearing life! │
└────────────────────────────────────┘ └────────────────────────────────────┘

What is Concentricity?

Under ASME Y14.5-2009 Section 7.6.4 , concentricity is defined as that condition where the derived median points of all diametrically opposed elements of a surface of revolution are congruent with a datum axis.

Tolerance Zone : A cylinder centered on the datum axis.

Material Condition : Applies strictly at RFS ; MMC (Ⓜ) is prohibited.

The Form-Insensitivity Flaw of Concentricity

Because concentricity evaluates only the mathematical midpoint between diametrically opposed surface points, it is completely blind to odd-lobed surface form errors :

Consider a shaft produced by centerless grinding with pronounced three-lobed or five-lobed out-of-roundness .

For every high lobe on one side, there is a corresponding valley directly opposite it. When a CMM samples opposing points, the calculated midpoint falls almost exactly on the theoretical center axis!

Result : The severely lobed part passes concentricity easily. However, when installed in a precision journal bearing, the three rotating lobes act like hammer blows against the bearing wall, inducing rapid oil film breakdown, violent vibration, and premature bearing destruction.

The Metrological Nightmare of Concentricity Verification

Verifying concentricity requires mapping hundreds of coordinate points along the physical surface, pairing diametrically opposed points, computing their mathematical midpoints, and verifying whether all midpoints lie within a microscopic tolerance cylinder. This requires complex CMM algorithms and extensive measurement time. It cannot be measured with a dial indicator .

Why Runout is Superior for Dynamic Applications

Runout uses a dial indicator that directly tracks the physical peaks and valleys of the rotating surface. The moment an out-of-round lobe or eccentric offset contacts the indicator tip, the needle swings, registering the exact operational displacement that mating bearings, seals, or gears will experience.

Note

Historical & Standard Evolution Note: Because concentricity was so widely misused and metrologically difficult to verify without offering functional advantages over runout, ASME Y14.5-2018 completely eliminated Concentricity and Symmetry from the standard, replacing them entirely with Runout, Profile, and Position controls.

Runout vs. Coaxial Position: RFS Precision vs. MMC Functional Gaging

When controlling the coaxial relationship between two or more cylindrical features of size, the two primary modern choices under ASME Y14.5-2009 are Coaxial Position (Section 7.6.2) and Runout (Section 9) . COAXIAL POSITION vs. RUNOUT TRADE-OFF

COAXIAL POSITION AT MMC RUNOUT AT RFS
┌────────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
│ [ ⌖ | Ø0.15 Ⓜ | A Ⓜ ] │ │ [ ↗ | 0.15 | A ] │
├────────────────────────────────────┤ ├────────────────────────────────────┤
│ • Controls AME axis │ │ • Controls actual surface │
│ • Bonus tolerance permitted (Ⓜ) │ │ • Zero bonus tolerance (RFS only) │
│ • Functional receiver gage allowed │ │ • Dynamic dial indicator required │
│ • Form governed only by Rule #1 │ │ • Form (roundness/wobble) checked │
│ • Ideal for static clearance fits │ │ • Ideal for rotating shafts/spindles│
└────────────────────────────────────┘ └────────────────────────────────────┘
Coaxial Position at MMC

Governing Principle : Position controls the location of the Actual Mating Envelope (AME) axis relative to the datum axis.

Bonus Tolerance : When specified with the Maximum Material Condition modifier ( Ⓜ ), departure of the feature from MMC provides bonus tolerance ( B o n u s = ∣ A c t u a l S i z e − M M C ∣ Bonus = |Actual\ Size - MMC| B o n u s = ∣ A c t u a l S i ze − MMC ∣ ). If datum features are specified at MMB ( Ⓜ ), datum shift is also available.

Functional Gaging (ASME Y14.43) : Coaxial position at MMC can be verified in seconds using a hard functional receiver gage with fixed Go pins/bushings.

Limitation : Position does not control surface form defects (such as lobing or surface waviness) beyond the standard envelope boundary of Rule #1.

Runout at RFS

Governing Principle : Directly controls the physical surface envelope .

Zero Bonus Tolerance : Always applies at RFS. No bonus tolerance or datum shift is permitted, guaranteeing strict boundary control.

Inspection : Requires dynamic 360° rotational inspection with dial indicators on every part; hard functional gages cannot be used.

Master Comparative Selection Matrix

Geometric Characteristic Symbol ASME Section Controlled Geometry Datum Axis Required? Material Condition Modifiers? Form Control Included? Primary Inspection Tool Optimal Engineering Application

Circularity ○ 5.4.3 Individual 2D circular cross-sections Prohibited (Datum-free) Prohibited (RFS only) 2D Roundness only V-block & dial indicator, Roundness machine Hydraulic cylinder barrels, piston skirts

Cylindricity ⌭ 5.4.4 Entire 3D cylindrical surface envelope Prohibited (Datum-free) Prohibited (RFS only) Roundness, Straightness, Taper CMM, Precision roundness instrument Dowel pins, precision piston pins, roller bearings

Concentricity ◎ 7.6.4 Derived median points of opposed elements Mandatory Prohibited (RFS only) None (Blind to odd lobing) CMM point-by-point differential software Precise dynamic mass balance on non-uniform parts

Coaxial Position ⌖ 7.6.2 Axis of Actual Mating Envelope Mandatory Permitted (Ⓜ, Ⓛ, or RFS) None (Governed only by Rule #1) Hard functional receiver gage, CMM Bolted clearance flanges, static housing bores, gear shafts

Circular Runout ↗ 9.4.1 Independent 2D circular elements of surface Mandatory Prohibited (RFS only) Circularity & Wobble per slice Dial indicator on rotating centers (fixed station) Rotating pulley journals, multi-step shafts, O-ring lands

Total Runout ⌰ 9.4.2 Entire 3D physical surface simultaneously Mandatory Prohibited (RFS only) Circularity, Straightness, Taper, Coaxiality Dial indicator traversing rotating part on centers Machine tool spindle tapers, turbine rotors, high-RPM driveshafts

Engineering Application Case Studies & Decision Guidelines
Case Study 1: High-Speed Rotating Shafts & Dynamic Imbalance

Application : Electric vehicle motor rotor shaft operating at 18 , 000 RPM 18,000\text{ RPM} 18 , 000 RPM .

Failure Mechanism : At high rotational velocities, any physical eccentricity or taper generates centrifugal forces proportional to the square of angular velocity ( F c = m ⋅ r ⋅ ω 2 F_c = m \cdot r \cdot \omega^2 F c = m ⋅ r ⋅ ω 2 ). Coaxial position at MMC is unacceptable because bonus tolerance would permit unacceptable mass eccentricity, and position does not restrict surface lobing.

Design Selection : Specify Total Runout ( ⌰ ) relative to compound datum axis [ A-B ] (the bearing mounting journals). This guarantees that bearing journals, seal surfaces, and the rotor core laminations remain coaxial, round, and free of taper within micro-inch limits, ensuring dynamic balance and quiet operation.

Case Study 2: Precision Machine Tool Spindle Chucks

Application : CNC lathe headstock spindle nose taper and mounting flange.

Failure Mechanism : Angular tilt or axial wobble on the mounting flange causes cutting tool chatter, runout at the workpiece tip, and poor surface finish.

Design Selection : Specify Total Runout ( ⌰ ) on the spindle face and conical taper relative to the main bearing journal datum axis. Total runout on the perpendicular shoulder face guarantees both perpendicularity and flatness simultaneously, eliminating tool arbor wobble.

Case Study 3: Turbine Rotors & Multi-Stage Compressors

Application : Multi-stage jet engine compressor rotor with labyrinth air seals.

Failure Mechanism : Knife-edge labyrinth seal lands must hold tight radial clearances ( < 0.10 mm < 0.10\text{ mm} < 0.10 mm ) to prevent high-pressure gas leakage without contacting stator shrouds.

Design Selection : Specify Circular Runout ( ↗ ) relative to datum axis [ A-B ] . Because the seal lands are narrow individual rings, circular runout provides full protection against eccentricity and out-of-roundness without the cost of continuous axial traversal over non-functional stepped surfaces.

Case Study 4: Static Hydraulic Seals & Bolted Housings

Application : Hydraulic pump end cap with a counterbored O-ring cavity and bolt circle.

Failure Mechanism : Assembly clearance and fastener pass-through in non-rotating static service.

Design Selection : Specify Coaxial Position at MMC ( [ ⌖ | Ø0.2 Ⓜ | A Ⓜ ] ) . In static applications, surface lobing and micro-inch wobble are completely non-critical. Specifying position at MMC enables high-volume manufacturing with functional Go receiver gages, saving significant tooling and inspection expense.

Common Exam Traps: Comparative Geometric Controls

Trap 1: Selecting Concentricity for High-Speed Bearing Journals : An exam question describes a high-speed rotating shaft and asks which control should prevent bearing vibration. Examinees often pick concentricity because of its intuitive name. Incorrect. Concentricity ignores surface lobing. Runout is the correct answer.

Trap 2: Believing Cylindricity Controls Coaxiality : Assuming that a small cylindricity tolerance ensures a cylinder will run true to a shaft centerline. Cylindricity has no datum reference; a cylinder can be perfectly cylindrical while severely misaligned with the datum axis.

Trap 3: Specifying Functional Gages for Runout Verification : Proposing a hard receiver gage to verify runout. Functional gages only verify virtual condition envelopes at MMC; runout is strictly RFS and must be verified by dynamic dial indicator rotation.

Trap 4: Overlooking Rule #1 Envelope Protection in Coaxial Position : Assuming coaxial position at MMC provides zero control over form. Rule #1 provides form boundary control at MMC; however, as the feature departs from MMC, form errors (such as banana camber or out-of-roundness) are allowed to expand within the size limits.

Trap 5: Assuming Concentricity Permits MMC Modifiers : Concentricity, like runout, applies strictly at RFS. Concentricity can never have an MMC (Ⓜ) modifier in ASME Y14.5-2009.