Study guide
8.5 Surface vs. Axis Interpretation of Position & the Boundary Concept for Slots, Tabs & Noncircular Features
ASME GDTP Technologist Y14.5-2009
Track your progress as you read
Finished sections get a check mark.
1 Chapter 1: Scope, Certification Logistics, Fundamental Rules & General Dimensioning
1.1 ASME GDTP Technologist Exam Scope, Prometric Logistics, & Certification Rules 1.2 Fundamental Rules of ASME Y14.5-2009 (Rules a through p) 1.3 Engineering Drawing Standards, Drawing Units, & Basic vs. Toleranced Dimensions 1.4 Dimensioning Features: Diameters, Radii, Chamfers, Countersinks, Counterbores, Spotfaces, Keyseats & Slots 1.5 Application of Dimensions & Location of Features: Lines, Leaders, Reference Dimensions, Rectangular vs. Polar Coordinates
2 Chapter 2: Features, Limits of Size, & Material Condition Principles
2.1 Features, Features of Size, & Limits of Size 2.2 Rule #1 (Taylor Principle / Envelope Rule), Its Exceptions & Overrides 2.3 Material Condition Concepts: MMC, LMC, & RFS Calculations
3 Chapter 3: General Tolerancing & Symbology
3.1 Direct Tolerancing, Limit Dimensioning, & Angular Tolerancing 3.2 The 14 Geometric Characteristic Symbols, Feature Control Frames, & Special Modifiers 3.3 Screw Threads, Gears & Splines, Angular Surfaces, Tapers & Statistical Tolerancing 3.4 Feature Control Frame Placement, Combined Frames, Tolerance Zone Definition & Tabulated Tolerances
4 Chapter 4: Datum Reference Frames & Degrees of Freedom
4.1 Theoretical Datums, Datum Feature Simulators, & Physical Datum Features 4.2 Degrees of Freedom Constraint & The 3-2-1 Datum Precedence System 4.3 Planar, Cylindrical, & Width Datum Feature Establishment
5 Chapter 5: Advanced Datum Applications: Targets, Boundary Modifiers, Customized Frames & Restrained Condition
5.1 Datum Target Points, Lines, Areas, & Movable Datum Simulators 5.2 Material Boundary Modifiers (RMB, MMB, LMB) & Datum Shift Calculations 5.3 Functional Datum Feature Selection, Multiple Datum Reference Frames & Simultaneous vs. Separate Requirements 5.4 Rotational Constraint About a Datum Axis or Point & Customized Datum Reference Frames 5.5 Irregular & Complex Datum Features, Mathematically Defined Surfaces, Restrained Condition & Datum Feature Controls
6 Chapter 6: Form Tolerances
6.1 Flatness & Straightness Controls for Surfaces & Features of Size 6.2 Circularity & Cylindricity Controls, Differences, & Inspection
7 Chapter 7: Orientation Tolerances
7.1 Parallelism Controls for Planar Surfaces & Cylindrical Features of Size 7.2 Perpendicularity & Angularity Tolerances with Basic Angles & Tangent Plane
8 Chapter 8: Location: Position Fundamentals & Calculations
8.1 Position Tolerancing Fundamentals, True Position, & Coordinate Conversions 8.2 Bonus Tolerance & Virtual Condition Calculations for Internal & External Features 8.3 Projected Tolerance Zones (Ⓟ Modifier) & Fixed vs. Floating Fastener Formulas 8.4 Zero Positional and Orientation Tolerancing at MMC and at LMC 8.5 Surface vs. Axis Interpretation of Position & the Boundary Concept for Slots, Tabs & Noncircular Features
9 Chapter 9: Location: Patterns, Composite Controls, Coaxial & Symmetrical Relationships, and Functional Gaging
9.1 Hole & Slot Patterns, Multi-Segment Frames, & Composite Position Tolerancing 9.2 Functional Gaging Principles & Inspection Verification of Position 9.3 Coaxial Holes, Counterbored Holes, Non-Parallel Axes, Spherical Features & Bidirectional Position 9.4 Concentricity & Symmetry Tolerances Under ASME Y14.5-2009 9.5 LMC Applied to Position: Wall Thickness, Breakout Protection & Boundary Calculations
10 Chapter 10: Profile Tolerances
10.1 Profile of a Line & Profile of a Surface Fundamentals & Basic Geometry 10.2 Bilateral, Unilateral, & Unequally Disposed Profile Boundaries (Ⓤ Modifier) 10.3 Composite Profile Tolerances vs. Multiple Single-Segment Profile Controls 10.4 Profile Verification, Coplanarity Controls, & Non-Rigid Parts 10.5 Profile Applications: Conicity, Extruded and Irregular Shapes, and Profile-Controlled Datum Features 10.6 Modifier Rules for Profile & Combined Controls (Profile with Position, Orientation and Runout)
11 Chapter 11: Runout Tolerances & Comparative Control Analysis
11.1 Circular Runout vs. Total Runout Interpretation & Dial Indicator Verification 11.2 Comparative Analysis: Runout vs. Form, Orientation, & Concentricity Controls
8.5 Surface vs. Axis Interpretation of Position & the Boundary Concept for Slots, Tabs & Noncircular Features
Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI
ASME Y14.5-2009 explains a position tolerance at MMC in terms of the surface of a hole, where no surface element may violate the virtual condition boundary, and in terms of the axis, where the derived axis must lie in a cylindrical zone.
The surface interpretation and the axis interpretation agree for a perfectly formed feature but can diverge when the feature is bowed or tapered, and where they differ the surface interpretation governs.
Para. 7.4.5 applies the principles of positional tolerancing to noncircular features of size such as open-end slots, tabs, and elongated holes, locating the center plane established by the parallel surfaces with the diameter symbol omitted.
The boundary concept extends position to irregularly shaped features of size such as a D-shaped hole where a center is not conveniently identifiable, in combination with profile under para. 8.8.
Para. 7.4.3 permits different positional tolerances at the extremities of a long hole, which establishes a conical rather than a cylindrical tolerance zone.
Last updated: September 2026
8.5 Surface vs. Axis Interpretation of Position & the Boundary Concept for Slots, Tabs & Noncircular Features
Quick Answer: ASME Y14.5-2009 gives position at MMC two explanations that are not always numerically identical: the requirement stated in terms of the surface of a hole (no element of the surface may violate the virtual condition boundary) and the requirement stated in terms of the axis of a hole (the feature axis must lie within a cylindrical zone). Where they differ, the surface interpretation governs — it is the one a functional gage enforces. For noncircular features of size such as open-end slots, tabs, and elongated holes , para. 7.4.5 applies the same principles, using a positional tolerance to locate the center plane established by the parallel surfaces , with the diameter symbol omitted because the zone is two parallel planes. The boundary concept extends this to irregular shapes such as a D-shaped hole where a center is not conveniently identifiable — see also para. 8.8 .
Two Explanations of the Same Requirement
Para. 7.3 explains a position tolerance at MMC in two ways:
(a) In terms of the surface of a hole — while maintaining the specified size limits, no element of the hole surface shall be inside a theoretical boundary located at true position. That boundary is the virtual condition .
(b) In terms of the axis of a hole — where a hole is at MMC, its axis must fall within a cylindrical tolerance zone whose axis is at true position, of diameter equal to the specified tolerance. As the hole departs from MMC, the zone diameter grows by the amount of the departure. SURFACE INTERPRETATION AXIS INTERPRETATION
(boundary must stay clear) (axis must stay in the zone)
- ╭──────────────────╮ ╭──────────────────╮
- │ ╭──────────╮ │ │ ╭──────────╮ │
- │ │ hole │ │ │ │ hole ⋮ │ │
- │ ╰──────────╯ │ │ ╰────────⋮─╯ │
- │ ┈┈┈ VC boundary │ │ zone ⌀t+bonus│
- ╰──────────────────╯ ╰──────────────────╯
- NO surface element may The derived AXIS must lie
encroach inside the VC. entirely within the zone.
What a functional gage checks. What a CMM typically reports.
Where the Two Diverge
For a perfectly straight hole the two interpretations agree exactly. They separate when the hole has form error — a bow, a taper, or a barrel :
- Condition Surface Interpretation Axis Interpretation
- Straight hole, displaced Boundary clear ⇒ pass Axis in zone ⇒ pass
Bowed hole , mid-length bulge toward true position Surface may violate the VC boundary ⇒ fail Best-fit axis may still lie inside the zone ⇒ pass
Tapered hole Small end may violate the VC ⇒ fail Axis of the mating envelope may pass
When the two interpretations conflict, the surface interpretation is the governing requirement. This is the technical reason a part can be accepted by a CMM report and then refuse to accept a functional gage pin — the CMM reported an axis, the gage tested a boundary.
Practical rule for the exam: if a stem mentions a functional gage , a boundary , or a part that "will not assemble despite passing CMM inspection," reason with the surface interpretation and the virtual condition .
Noncircular Features of Size (Para. 7.4.5)
The fundamental principles of true position dimensioning and positional tolerancing for circular features of size, such as holes and bosses, apply also to noncircular features of size, such as open-end slots, tabs, and elongated holes . For such features of size, a positional tolerance is used to locate the center plane established by the parallel surfaces of the feature of size.
Two consequences follow immediately:
The diameter symbol is omitted. Per para. 3.6, a value without the diameter symbol is the distance between two parallel planes . A slot controlled ⌖ | 0.4 | A | B | C has a zone 0.4 wide, centred on the true position of the slot's center plane.
The tolerance applies in the direction that matters. A slot has a width direction and a length direction; the center-plane zone constrains the width direction . Where both directions need control, two feature control frames or a bidirectional scheme is used.
Bonus Tolerance on a Slot
The MMC arithmetic is identical to a hole, just applied to a width rather than a diameter. For a slot 12.00 – 12.30 wide with ⌖ | 0.2 Ⓜ | A | B | C :
MMC = 12.00 (the narrowest slot contains the most material)
Virtual condition = 12.00 − 0.20 = 11.80 = 12.00 - 0.20 = \mathbf{11.80} = 12.00 − 0.20 = 11.80 — the width of the functional gage element that must pass through
Slot produced at 12.10 : bonus = 12.10 − 12.00 = 0.10 = 12.10 - 12.00 = 0.10 = 12.10 − 12.00 = 0.10 , total tolerance = 0.20 + 0.10 = 0.30 = 0.20 + 0.10 = \mathbf{0.30} = 0.20 + 0.10 = 0.30 . Check: 12.10 − 0.30 = 11.80 12.10 - 0.30 = 11.80 12.10 − 0.30 = 11.80 ✓
Slot produced at 12.25 : bonus = 12.25 − 12.00 = 0.25 = 12.25 - 12.00 = 0.25 = 12.25 − 12.00 = 0.25 , total tolerance = 0.20 + 0.25 = 0.45 = 0.20 + 0.25 = \mathbf{0.45} = 0.20 + 0.25 = 0.45 . Check: 12.25 − 0.45 = 11.80 12.25 - 0.45 = 11.80 12.25 − 0.45 = 11.80 ✓
Slot produced at 12.30 (LMC) : bonus = 0.30 = 0.30 = 0.30 , total tolerance = 0.50 = \mathbf{0.50} = 0.50 . Check: 12.30 − 0.50 = 11.80 12.30 - 0.50 = 11.80 12.30 − 0.50 = 11.80 ✓
The boundary is invariant at 11.80 in every row, exactly as it is for a hole. Use that invariance as your arithmetic check : if produced size − total tolerance does not return the virtual condition, the bonus was computed from the wrong limit.
The Boundary Concept for Irregular Shapes
The standard notes that the boundary concept can also be applied to other irregularly shaped features of size — such as a D-shaped hole with a flattened side — where the center is not conveniently identifiable , and cross-references para. 8.8, Combined Controls .
The mechanism: instead of describing a center plane or an axis, the drawing establishes a theoretical boundary of identical shape to the true profile , located at true position, that the feature surface may not violate. Under para. 8.8 , basic dimensions and a profile tolerance establish the zone controlling the shape and size of the feature, while the positional tolerance establishes a theoretical boundary shaped identically to the true profile . For an internal feature the surface may not encroach inside that boundary; for an external feature it may not extend outside it.
- Feature Position Zone Geometry Diameter Symbol? Governing Boundary
- Round hole Cylinder Yes ( ⌀ ) Virtual condition cylinder
- Spherical feature (7.4.6) Sphere Yes ( S⌀ ) Virtual condition sphere
- Slot, tab, elongated hole (7.4.5) Two parallel planes No Virtual condition width
- Bidirectional round hole (7.4.4) Two parallel planes, per direction No Boundary per direction
D-shaped or irregular FOS (7.4.5 note, 8.8) Boundary of the true profile shape No Theoretical boundary at true position
The unifying idea. Every one of these controls, whatever the zone geometry, ultimately guarantees the same thing: a constant worst-case boundary that the mating part is designed against. Once you can name the boundary, the rest of the arithmetic follows.
Closer Control at One End (Para. 7.4.3)
Where the design permits, different positional tolerances may be specified for the extremities of long holes , which establishes a conical rather than a cylindrical tolerance zone . This is how a designer keeps a deep bore tightly located where a bearing seats while relaxing it where nothing mates.