Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial (FRE 803)

California Bar Exam Exam

Track your progress as you read

Finished sections get a check mark.

1 Exam Format and Core Skills

California Bar Exam Blueprint: Subjects, Components, and Recent Changes Exam Format, Scoring, and the 1390 Passing Score Essay Strategy: Issue Spotting and IRAC Core Written Skills and Timing Strategy

2 Civil Procedure

Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Federal Question, Diversity, Supplemental, Removal Personal Jurisdiction, Long-Arm, Minimum Contacts, and Service of Process Venue, Transfer, and Forum Non Conveniens The Erie Doctrine and Choice of Law Pleadings, Rule 11, Amendments, and California Demurrers / Anti-SLAPP Joinder of Claims and Parties, Impleader, Intervention, Interpleader Class Actions (Rule 23 and California) Discovery: Scope, Devices, Privilege, and Sanctions Pretrial Adjudication: Dismissals, Default, and Summary Judgment Trial, Jury, Judgment as a Matter of Law, and Post-Trial Motions Appeals, the Final Judgment Rule, and Claim/Issue Preclusion

3 Constitutional Law

Judicial Review, Justiciability, Standing, Ripeness, Mootness, and Political Questions Federal Legislative Power: Commerce, Taxing & Spending, and the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments Separation of Powers: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Authority Federalism, Supremacy, Preemption, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and Privileges & Immunities State Action and Congressional Enforcement of the Reconstruction Amendments Procedural Due Process Substantive Due Process and Fundamental Rights Equal Protection and Levels of Scrutiny First Amendment: Speech, Press, Forums, and Association First Amendment Religion Clauses and the Takings Clause

4 Contracts

Applicable Law: Common Law vs. UCC Article 2 and Mixed Contracts Mutual Assent: Offer, Acceptance, Mailbox Rule, and UCC 2-207 Consideration, Bargained-for Exchange, and Promissory Estoppel Defenses to Formation: Capacity, Mistake, Misrepresentation, Duress, Unconscionability The Statute of Frauds Parol Evidence Rule and Contract Interpretation Conditions and Performance: Express, Constructive, and Substantial Performance Breach, Anticipatory Repudiation, and the Perfect Tender Rule Excuse of Performance: Impossibility, Impracticability, and Frustration UCC Warranties and Risk of Loss Third-Party Beneficiaries, Assignment, and Delegation Contract Remedies and UCC Buyer/Seller Remedies

5 Criminal Law and Procedure

Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Concurrence, and Causation Accomplice Liability and Parties to Crime Inchoate Crimes: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation Homicide: Murder, Manslaughter, Felony Murder, and California Degrees Other Crimes Against the Person: Assault, Battery, Kidnapping, and Sex Offenses Property and Theft Crimes: Larceny, Embezzlement, Robbery, Burglary, Arson Criminal Defenses: Insanity, Intoxication, Self-Defense, Duress, Necessity, Mistake Fourth Amendment: Searches, Seizures, Warrants, and Exceptions The Exclusionary Rule, Standing, and Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Fifth Amendment: Miranda, Self-Incrimination, and Double Jeopardy Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel, Confrontation, Speedy Trial, and Jury Pretrial Identifications, the Eighth Amendment, and Trial Rights

6 Evidence

Relevance: Logical and Legal, Rule 403, and California Proposition 8 Policy-Based Exclusions: Subsequent Remedial Measures, Settlements, Insurance, Pleas Authentication and the Best Evidence Rule Witness Competency, Personal Knowledge, and Examination Impeachment of Witnesses Lay and Expert Opinion Testimony (Daubert and California Kelly/Sargon) Character Evidence and Other Acts (MIMIC) Habit and Methods of Proving Character Hearsay: Definition, Non-Hearsay, and Exemptions Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial (FRE 803) Hearsay Exceptions Requiring Unavailability (FRE 804) and the Confrontation Clause Privileges, Judicial Notice, and Presumptions (Federal and California)

7 Real Property

1.1 Estates in Land 1.2 Future Interests 1.3 Rule Against Perpetuities 1.4 Concurrent Ownership 1.5 Landlord-Tenant Law 1.6 Easements and Servitudes 1.7 Covenants Running with Land 1.8 Recording Acts and Title 1.9 Mortgages 1.10 Land Use Regulation Adverse Possession and Rights Incident to Ownership Land Sale Contracts, Marketable Title, and Risk of Loss Deeds, Delivery, Warranties of Title, and Fixtures

8 Torts

Intentional Torts Against the Person: Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, IIED Intentional Torts to Property and Defenses/Privileges Negligence: Duty and the Standard of Care Negligence: Breach, Res Ipsa Loquitur, and Negligence Per Se Causation: Actual and Proximate Cause Negligence Damages and Defenses: Comparative Fault and Assumption of Risk Strict Liability: Animals and Abnormally Dangerous Activities Products Liability Private and Public Nuisance Defamation Invasion of Privacy, Misrepresentation, and Economic Torts Vicarious Liability, Joint Tortfeasors, and Immunities

9 Business Associations

Agency: Formation, Actual and Apparent Authority, and Ratification Agency: Principal/Agent Duties, Respondeat Superior, and Tort Liability General Partnerships: Formation, Rights, and Partnership Property Partnership Liability, Fiduciary Duties, Dissociation, and Dissolution Limited Partnerships, LLPs, and LLCs Corporations: Formation, Promoters, and Piercing the Corporate Veil Corporate Finance: Stock, Securities, Dividends, and Distributions Directors and Officers: Fiduciary Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, and Indemnification Shareholders, Derivative Suits, Fundamental Changes, and Federal Securities (10b-5, 16(b))

10 Community Property

General Principles, the Community Estate, and Marital Economic Community Characterization: Separate vs. Community Property and Presumptions Tracing and Commingling (Exhaustion and Direct Tracing) Transmutation and Premarital/Marital Agreements Special Assets: Businesses (Pereira/Van Camp), Goodwill, Education, Pensions, Disability Management, Control, and Spousal Fiduciary Duties Debts and Creditors' Rights Distribution at Dissolution and Death; Quasi-Community Property

11 Professional Responsibility

Regulation of the Profession, Admission, and Discipline (California Rules vs. ABA Model Rules) Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Scope of Representation Confidentiality and Its Exceptions (California vs. ABA) Conflicts of Interest: Current Clients Conflicts: Former Clients, Imputation, and Business Transactions Fees, Client Trust Accounts (IOLTA), and Safekeeping Property Duties to the Court and Third Parties: Candor, Advocacy, and Fairness Forming, Declining, and Terminating the Attorney-Client Relationship Advertising, Solicitation, and the Unauthorized Practice of Law Judicial Ethics, Reporting Misconduct, and Special Prosecutor Duties

12 Remedies

Compensatory Damages: Causation, Foreseeability, Certainty, and Mitigation Punitive, Nominal, and Liquidated Damages Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Constructive Trust and Equitable Lien Injunctions: Temporary Restraining Orders, Preliminary, and Permanent Specific Performance Reformation, Rescission, and Cancellation Equitable Defenses, Declaratory Relief, and Remedy Selection

13 Trusts

Trust Creation, Required Elements, and Types of Trusts Charitable Trusts, Cy Pres, and the Rule Against Perpetuities in Trusts Trustee Powers and Trust Administration Trustee Duties: Loyalty, Prudent Investor, and Impartiality Beneficiary Rights and Principal/Income Allocation Spendthrift, Discretionary, and Support Trusts; Creditors' Rights Modification and Termination of Trusts Breach of Trust, Remedies, and Will Substitutes (Totten, POD, Revocable Trusts)

14 Wills and Succession

Intestate Succession and California Distribution Will Execution and Formalities (Attested and Holographic; California) Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence, Fraud, Duress, and Mistake Will Components: Integration, Incorporation, Acts of Independent Significance, and Pour-Over Revocation, Revival, and Dependent Relative Revocation Lapse, Anti-Lapse, Class Gifts, Ademption, Abatement, and Exoneration Protection of the Family: Omitted Spouse and Child, Pretermitted Heirs Will Contests, Standing, and No-Contest Clauses Probate Administration, Powers of Appointment, and Will Substitutes

15 Performance Test

The Performance Test: Task Memo, File, and Library Objective PT Products: Memos, Briefs, and Client Letters Persuasive PT Products and 90-Minute Execution

Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial (FRE 803)

Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI

FRE 803 exceptions apply whether or not the declarant is available: 803(1) present sense impression (describing an event WHILE or immediately after perceiving it); 803(2) excited utterance (statement relating to a startling event made while under its stress).

FRE 803(3) then-existing mental, emotional, or physical condition (state of mind, intent, plan — admissible to show the declarant later acted on the intent under Mutual Life v. Hillmon; but NOT a statement of memory or belief to prove the fact remembered, except about a will).

FRE 803(4) statements for medical diagnosis or treatment (including cause if pertinent to treatment, but generally not fault); 803(5) recorded recollection (read into evidence, admitted as exhibit only by the adverse party).

FRE 803(6) business records (kept in the regular course, made at/near the time by someone with knowledge, regular practice — foundation by custodian or 902(11) certification; lacks-trustworthiness escape hatch); 803(8) public records (activities/observations of the office, but in CRIMINAL cases NOT police observations against the accused — and the record cannot be used to evade Confrontation/803(6) limits).

California analogs: CEC 1240 (spontaneous/excited utterance), CEC 1241 (contemporaneous statement — narrower, explains declarant's OWN conduct), CEC 1250-1251 (state of mind), CEC 1271 (business records), CEC 1280 (official records); California has NO present-sense-impression exception as broad as FRE 803(1) and NO general 803(4) medical-treatment exception (admits such statements through other routes).

Last updated: June 2026

FRE 803(1), the present sense impression, admits a statement describing or explaining an event or condition made WHILE or immediately after the declarant perceived it. The reliability theory is contemporaneity — no time to fabricate. FRE 803(2), the excited utterance, admits a statement RELATING TO a startling event or condition made while the declarant was still under the stress of excitement that it caused. The theory is that stress stills the capacity for reflection.

Key contrasts: a present sense impression must be essentially contemporaneous and must DESCRIBE the event, whereas an excited utterance need only RELATE to the startling event and may come somewhat later so long as the declarant remains under stress. Both can be made by an unidentified bystander. MBE trap: a calm, considered statement made an hour after a car crash is unlikely to qualify as either; look for the stress (excited) or the immediacy (present sense).

FRE 803(3) admits a statement of the declarant's THEN-EXISTING state of mind (intent, plan, motive), emotion, sensation, or physical condition ('I feel sick,' 'I intend to fly to Crooked Creek'). A statement of present INTENT may be used to prove the declarant later carried out that intent (Mutual Life Insurance v. Hillmon). But the exception expressly EXCLUDES a statement of memory or belief offered to prove the fact remembered or believed ('I think the brakes failed' cannot prove the brakes failed) — the one carve-out is a statement relating to the declarant's WILL.

FRE 803(4) admits statements made for, and reasonably pertinent to, medical DIAGNOSIS OR TREATMENT, describing medical history, past or present symptoms, or their inception or general cause when pertinent to treatment. Statements of FAULT or identity of the person responsible are usually NOT admissible (an exception exists for identifying an abuser in domestic-violence/child-abuse cases, because identity can be pertinent to treatment and safety).

FRE 803(5) recorded recollection admits a record that (a) is on a matter the witness once knew about, (b) was made or adopted when the matter was fresh in memory, and (c) accurately reflects that knowledge, where the witness now cannot recall well enough to testify fully; the record is READ into evidence and may be received as an exhibit only if offered by an ADVERSE party.

FRE 803(6) business records require: a record of an act, event, condition, opinion, or diagnosis; made at or near the time by — or from information transmitted by — someone with knowledge; kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity; where making the record was a regular practice; shown by a custodian or qualified witness (or a 902(11)/(12) certification) — UNLESS the source or method indicates a lack of trustworthiness. Records prepared in anticipation of litigation may be excluded as untrustworthy (Palmer v. Hoffman).

FRE 803(8) public records admit records setting out (i) the office's activities, (ii) matters observed under a legal duty to report (but NOT, in a CRIMINAL case, a matter observed by law-enforcement personnel offered against the accused), or (iii) in a civil case or against the government in a criminal case, factual findings from a legally authorized investigation. The prosecution cannot smuggle a police observation in via 803(6) to dodge 803(8)'s limit. FRE 803(18) admits learned treatises read into evidence (not as an exhibit) when relied on by an expert or established as authoritative.

Several 803 sub-rules carry tested wrinkles. The FRE 803(3) state-of-mind exception splits cleanly into permitted and forbidden uses: a statement of present INTENT proves the declarant later acted on that intent (Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Hillmon admitted 'I am going to Crooked Creek with Hillmon' to prove the declarant went), and may be used to prove the declarant's OWN subsequent conduct freely; using a Hillmon statement to prove a THIRD person's conduct ('to meet Dan') is contested and, under the House Report on the rule, should be limited.

But 803(3) flatly EXCLUDES a statement of memory or belief offered to prove the fact remembered ('I think the brakes failed' cannot prove the brakes failed), the single carve-out being a statement about the declarant's WILL. The 803(4) medical exception reaches statements made for and pertinent to diagnosis or treatment — symptoms, medical history, and the inception or general CAUSE of a condition — but generally NOT statements of fault or the identity of the wrongdoer, with a recognized exception in child-abuse and domestic-violence cases where identifying the abuser is pertinent to treatment and the victim's safety.

The 803(6) business-records and 803(8) public-records exceptions both contain a TRUSTWORTHINESS escape hatch: a business record is excluded if the source or method indicates a lack of trustworthiness (Palmer v. Hoffman excluded an accident report prepared primarily for litigation rather than railroad operations), and a public record's factual findings yield if circumstances indicate untrustworthiness.

The criminal-case limits interlock: FRE 803(8)(A)(ii) bars, against the accused, a matter OBSERVED by law-enforcement personnel, and FRE 803(8)(A)(iii) confines investigative factual findings to civil cases or to use AGAINST the government in a criminal case — and the prosecution may NOT smuggle a barred police observation in through the business-records exception. Work three hypotheticals. First, EXCITED UTTERANCE: minutes after a collision, a still-shaking bystander blurts 'the red truck ran the light' — admissible under 803(2) because the declarant remains under the stress of the startling event, even though her identity is unknown.

Second, BUSINESS RECORD with embedded hearsay: a hospital chart noting 'patient states he was struck by a forklift' is admissible as the record (803(6)) but the embedded patient statement needs its own basis — here 803(4) medical treatment supplies it. Third, PUBLIC-RECORD bar: an officer's incident report of his own observations, offered by the prosecution against the defendant, is barred by 803(8)(A)(ii) and cannot be rerouted through 803(6).

California diverges sharply: CEC 1240 mirrors the excited utterance but CEC 1241's contemporaneous-statement rule is narrower (it must explain the declarant's OWN conduct while engaged in it), California has NO broad present-sense-impression exception and NO freestanding medical-diagnosis exception (such statements enter via spontaneous-statement, admission, or expert-basis routes), and CEC 1271/1280 track business and official records though CEC 1280 dispenses with a live custodian.

Key FRE 803 Exceptions and California Counterparts

FRE 803 Description California
803(1) Present sense impression No broad analog (CEC 1241 narrower)
803(2) Excited utterance CEC 1240 (spontaneous statement)
803(3) Then-existing state of mind CEC 1250-1251
803(4) Medical diagnosis/treatment No freestanding analog
803(5) Recorded recollection CEC 1237
803(6) Business records CEC 1271
803(8) Public records CEC 1280

California's spontaneous-statement rule, CEC 1240, corresponds to the excited utterance and is broadly comparable. But CEC 1241, the contemporaneous-statement exception, is much NARROWER than FRE 803(1): it admits a statement only if it was made while the declarant was engaged in conduct AND it explains or qualifies the declarant's OWN conduct — California has no general present-sense-impression exception for a statement merely describing an observed event.

CEC 1250 admits statements of the declarant's then-existing state of mind/emotion/physical sensation when that state is itself in issue or to prove subsequent conduct, while CEC 1251 covers a PRIOR state of mind when the declarant is unavailable; CEC 1252 excludes such statements made under circumstances indicating lack of trustworthiness. California has NO general medical-diagnosis/treatment exception equivalent to FRE 803(4) — such statements often enter via the spontaneous-statement rule, party admissions, or expert-basis testimony.

CEC 1271 (business records) and CEC 1280 (official records) track the federal rules but CEC 1280 lets official records be admitted without a live custodian.