Study guide
Policy-Based Exclusions: Subsequent Remedial Measures, Settlements, Insurance, Pleas
California Bar Exam Exam
Track your progress as you read
Finished sections get a check mark.
1 Exam Format and Core Skills
California Bar Exam Blueprint: Subjects, Components, and Recent Changes Exam Format, Scoring, and the 1390 Passing Score Essay Strategy: Issue Spotting and IRAC Core Written Skills and Timing Strategy
2 Civil Procedure
Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Federal Question, Diversity, Supplemental, Removal Personal Jurisdiction, Long-Arm, Minimum Contacts, and Service of Process Venue, Transfer, and Forum Non Conveniens The Erie Doctrine and Choice of Law Pleadings, Rule 11, Amendments, and California Demurrers / Anti-SLAPP Joinder of Claims and Parties, Impleader, Intervention, Interpleader Class Actions (Rule 23 and California) Discovery: Scope, Devices, Privilege, and Sanctions Pretrial Adjudication: Dismissals, Default, and Summary Judgment Trial, Jury, Judgment as a Matter of Law, and Post-Trial Motions Appeals, the Final Judgment Rule, and Claim/Issue Preclusion
3 Constitutional Law
Judicial Review, Justiciability, Standing, Ripeness, Mootness, and Political Questions Federal Legislative Power: Commerce, Taxing & Spending, and the Tenth and Eleventh Amendments Separation of Powers: Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Authority Federalism, Supremacy, Preemption, the Dormant Commerce Clause, and Privileges & Immunities State Action and Congressional Enforcement of the Reconstruction Amendments Procedural Due Process Substantive Due Process and Fundamental Rights Equal Protection and Levels of Scrutiny First Amendment: Speech, Press, Forums, and Association First Amendment Religion Clauses and the Takings Clause
4 Contracts
Applicable Law: Common Law vs. UCC Article 2 and Mixed Contracts Mutual Assent: Offer, Acceptance, Mailbox Rule, and UCC 2-207 Consideration, Bargained-for Exchange, and Promissory Estoppel Defenses to Formation: Capacity, Mistake, Misrepresentation, Duress, Unconscionability The Statute of Frauds Parol Evidence Rule and Contract Interpretation Conditions and Performance: Express, Constructive, and Substantial Performance Breach, Anticipatory Repudiation, and the Perfect Tender Rule Excuse of Performance: Impossibility, Impracticability, and Frustration UCC Warranties and Risk of Loss Third-Party Beneficiaries, Assignment, and Delegation Contract Remedies and UCC Buyer/Seller Remedies
5 Criminal Law and Procedure
Actus Reus, Mens Rea, Concurrence, and Causation Accomplice Liability and Parties to Crime Inchoate Crimes: Attempt, Conspiracy, and Solicitation Homicide: Murder, Manslaughter, Felony Murder, and California Degrees Other Crimes Against the Person: Assault, Battery, Kidnapping, and Sex Offenses Property and Theft Crimes: Larceny, Embezzlement, Robbery, Burglary, Arson Criminal Defenses: Insanity, Intoxication, Self-Defense, Duress, Necessity, Mistake Fourth Amendment: Searches, Seizures, Warrants, and Exceptions The Exclusionary Rule, Standing, and Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Fifth Amendment: Miranda, Self-Incrimination, and Double Jeopardy Sixth Amendment: Right to Counsel, Confrontation, Speedy Trial, and Jury Pretrial Identifications, the Eighth Amendment, and Trial Rights
6 Evidence
Relevance: Logical and Legal, Rule 403, and California Proposition 8 Policy-Based Exclusions: Subsequent Remedial Measures, Settlements, Insurance, Pleas Authentication and the Best Evidence Rule Witness Competency, Personal Knowledge, and Examination Impeachment of Witnesses Lay and Expert Opinion Testimony (Daubert and California Kelly/Sargon) Character Evidence and Other Acts (MIMIC) Habit and Methods of Proving Character Hearsay: Definition, Non-Hearsay, and Exemptions Hearsay Exceptions: Availability Immaterial (FRE 803) Hearsay Exceptions Requiring Unavailability (FRE 804) and the Confrontation Clause Privileges, Judicial Notice, and Presumptions (Federal and California)
7 Real Property
1.1 Estates in Land 1.2 Future Interests 1.3 Rule Against Perpetuities 1.4 Concurrent Ownership 1.5 Landlord-Tenant Law 1.6 Easements and Servitudes 1.7 Covenants Running with Land 1.8 Recording Acts and Title 1.9 Mortgages 1.10 Land Use Regulation Adverse Possession and Rights Incident to Ownership Land Sale Contracts, Marketable Title, and Risk of Loss Deeds, Delivery, Warranties of Title, and Fixtures
8 Torts
Intentional Torts Against the Person: Battery, Assault, False Imprisonment, IIED Intentional Torts to Property and Defenses/Privileges Negligence: Duty and the Standard of Care Negligence: Breach, Res Ipsa Loquitur, and Negligence Per Se Causation: Actual and Proximate Cause Negligence Damages and Defenses: Comparative Fault and Assumption of Risk Strict Liability: Animals and Abnormally Dangerous Activities Products Liability Private and Public Nuisance Defamation Invasion of Privacy, Misrepresentation, and Economic Torts Vicarious Liability, Joint Tortfeasors, and Immunities
9 Business Associations
Agency: Formation, Actual and Apparent Authority, and Ratification Agency: Principal/Agent Duties, Respondeat Superior, and Tort Liability General Partnerships: Formation, Rights, and Partnership Property Partnership Liability, Fiduciary Duties, Dissociation, and Dissolution Limited Partnerships, LLPs, and LLCs Corporations: Formation, Promoters, and Piercing the Corporate Veil Corporate Finance: Stock, Securities, Dividends, and Distributions Directors and Officers: Fiduciary Duties, the Business Judgment Rule, and Indemnification Shareholders, Derivative Suits, Fundamental Changes, and Federal Securities (10b-5, 16(b))
10 Community Property
General Principles, the Community Estate, and Marital Economic Community Characterization: Separate vs. Community Property and Presumptions Tracing and Commingling (Exhaustion and Direct Tracing) Transmutation and Premarital/Marital Agreements Special Assets: Businesses (Pereira/Van Camp), Goodwill, Education, Pensions, Disability Management, Control, and Spousal Fiduciary Duties Debts and Creditors' Rights Distribution at Dissolution and Death; Quasi-Community Property
11 Professional Responsibility
Regulation of the Profession, Admission, and Discipline (California Rules vs. ABA Model Rules) Competence, Diligence, Communication, and Scope of Representation Confidentiality and Its Exceptions (California vs. ABA) Conflicts of Interest: Current Clients Conflicts: Former Clients, Imputation, and Business Transactions Fees, Client Trust Accounts (IOLTA), and Safekeeping Property Duties to the Court and Third Parties: Candor, Advocacy, and Fairness Forming, Declining, and Terminating the Attorney-Client Relationship Advertising, Solicitation, and the Unauthorized Practice of Law Judicial Ethics, Reporting Misconduct, and Special Prosecutor Duties
12 Remedies
Compensatory Damages: Causation, Foreseeability, Certainty, and Mitigation Punitive, Nominal, and Liquidated Damages Restitution and Unjust Enrichment Constructive Trust and Equitable Lien Injunctions: Temporary Restraining Orders, Preliminary, and Permanent Specific Performance Reformation, Rescission, and Cancellation Equitable Defenses, Declaratory Relief, and Remedy Selection
13 Trusts
Trust Creation, Required Elements, and Types of Trusts Charitable Trusts, Cy Pres, and the Rule Against Perpetuities in Trusts Trustee Powers and Trust Administration Trustee Duties: Loyalty, Prudent Investor, and Impartiality Beneficiary Rights and Principal/Income Allocation Spendthrift, Discretionary, and Support Trusts; Creditors' Rights Modification and Termination of Trusts Breach of Trust, Remedies, and Will Substitutes (Totten, POD, Revocable Trusts)
14 Wills and Succession
Intestate Succession and California Distribution Will Execution and Formalities (Attested and Holographic; California) Testamentary Capacity, Undue Influence, Fraud, Duress, and Mistake Will Components: Integration, Incorporation, Acts of Independent Significance, and Pour-Over Revocation, Revival, and Dependent Relative Revocation Lapse, Anti-Lapse, Class Gifts, Ademption, Abatement, and Exoneration Protection of the Family: Omitted Spouse and Child, Pretermitted Heirs Will Contests, Standing, and No-Contest Clauses Probate Administration, Powers of Appointment, and Will Substitutes
15 Performance Test
The Performance Test: Task Memo, File, and Library Objective PT Products: Memos, Briefs, and Client Letters Persuasive PT Products and 90-Minute Execution
Policy-Based Exclusions: Subsequent Remedial Measures, Settlements, Insurance, Pleas
Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI
FRE 407 (subsequent remedial measures): evidence of repairs/changes made AFTER an injury is inadmissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a product defect, or a need for warning — but admissible for impeachment, ownership/control, or feasibility (if disputed).
FRE 408 (compromise offers): conduct or statements made in compromise negotiations of a DISPUTED claim are inadmissible to prove liability, invalidity, or amount; an exception exists for proving witness bias or obstructing a criminal investigation.
FRE 409 (medical expenses): paying or offering to pay medical/hospital expenses is inadmissible to prove liability — but unlike 408, accompanying ADMISSIONS of fact made with such offers ARE admissible.
FRE 410 (pleas): withdrawn guilty pleas, nolo contendere pleas, and statements during plea discussions with a prosecutor are inadmissible against the defendant; FRE 411: liability insurance is inadmissible to prove negligence but admissible for bias, agency, ownership, or control.
California: CEC 1151 (remedial measures, no feasibility carve-out language), CEC 1152/1154 (settlement offers — broader, covering humanitarian payments), CEC 1153 (pleas); CA admits liability-insurance evidence more narrowly under CEC 1155.
Last updated: June 2026
When a measure is taken that would have made an earlier injury or harm less likely to occur, evidence of the subsequent measure is NOT admissible to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a defect in a product or its design, or a need for a warning or instruction. The policy is to encourage defendants to fix dangers without fear that the repair becomes a confession. Three timing points matter: (1) the measure must come AFTER the injury that gives rise to the suit; a repair made before the plaintiff's accident is not barred.
(2) The rule applies in strict-products cases (federal courts applied 407 to product-defect claims after the 1997 amendment). (3) The evidence is admissible for OTHER purposes — impeachment, or, if DISPUTED, proving ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures. MBE trap: a defendant who testifies 'there was no safer way to build it' has put feasibility in dispute and opened the door to the repair.
FRE 408 bars two things when offered to prove or disprove the validity or amount of a DISPUTED claim: (1) furnishing, promising, or offering — or accepting or offering to accept — a valuable consideration in compromising the claim, and (2) conduct or statements made during compromise negotiations. The dispute requirement is critical: there must be an actual dispute as to validity or amount, so a bare admission of an undisputed debt ('I owe you $500, but I can only pay $300') is not protected. Permitted uses include proving a witness's bias or prejudice, negating undue delay, or showing an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation.
FRE 409 separately bars offers to pay medical expenses to prove liability — but, unlike 408, FRE 409 protects ONLY the offer/payment, not collateral admissions of fact ('I'll pay your hospital bill; I ran the red light' — the red-light admission comes in). This 408-vs-409 distinction is a frequent MBE discriminator.
FRE 410 makes inadmissible against the defendant who made the plea: (1) a withdrawn guilty plea, (2) a nolo contendere (no contest) plea, (3) statements made during a Rule 11 plea proceeding, and (4) statements made during plea discussions WITH A PROSECUTOR that did not result in a guilty plea (or resulted in a later-withdrawn one). Statements to police (not the prosecutor) are generally NOT protected. The defendant can waive 410 (United States v. Mezzanatto).
FRE 411 bars evidence that a person was or was not insured against liability to prove negligence or wrongful conduct — but it IS admissible to prove a witness's bias or prejudice, or, if disputed, agency, ownership, or control. So a mechanic who tells the jury he has no stake may be impeached with proof he carries the defendant's liability coverage.
The unifying lesson of the policy exclusions is that none of them is an absolute bar — each forbids only a single forbidden inference while leaving the evidence admissible for other, properly limited purposes, and a limiting instruction (FRE 105) is available on request. FRE 407 bars the subsequent measure only to prove negligence, culpable conduct, a product defect, or a need for a warning; it remains admissible to impeach, and — when DISPUTED — to prove ownership, control, or the feasibility of precautionary measures.
The litigated battleground is feasibility: a defendant who merely denies negligence has NOT disputed feasibility, but a defendant who testifies the design was 'the safest possible' or that 'no safer alternative existed' opens the door to the post-accident fix.
FRE 408 likewise bars compromise evidence only on the validity or amount of a disputed claim, but permits it to show a witness's bias or prejudice, to negate a contention of undue delay, or to prove an effort to obstruct a criminal investigation; critically, statements of fact made during negotiations are protected under the FRE even if not themselves conciliatory, but ONLY if a genuine dispute as to validity or amount already exists when they are made.
The 408/409 contrast is a perennial discriminator: 409 shields only the offer or payment of medical expenses, never the surrounding factual admissions, so 'I'll pay your hospital bill — I ran the light' splits, with the bill-payment excluded and the red-light admission admitted. FRE 410's plea protection extends to statements made during plea discussions WITH A PROSECUTOR (or an agent with authority), not to volunteered statements to police, and the protection can be waived (Mezzanatto).
FRE 411 bars insurance evidence to prove fault but admits it to show a witness's bias (a defense expert who carries the defendant's coverage), agency, ownership, or control when disputed. The disciplined exam method is two steps: first identify the forbidden purpose the rule blocks, then ask whether the proponent offers the evidence for a permitted purpose AND whether the predicate (a dispute over feasibility, ownership, bias) has actually been raised.
California tracks these carve-outs imperfectly — CEC 1151 lacks the express feasibility exception, and CEC 1152's settlement protection is broader, reaching humanitarian and unsolicited offers — so a California answer should name the specific Evidence Code section rather than assume the federal carve-out transfers. Because these are policy and reliability rules rather than relevance rules, Proposition 8 generally does not resurrect the excluded evidence in criminal cases where the Legislature re-enacted the protection, and most of these doctrines arise in civil litigation in any event.
Policy Exclusions — Barred Purpose vs. Permitted Uses (FRE & CEC)
Rule Barred to prove Permitted uses CA analog
407 Negligence, defect, need for warning Impeachment; ownership/control; feasibility if disputed CEC 1151 (no express feasibility carve-out)
408 Validity/amount of disputed claim Bias; obstruction of criminal investigation CEC 1152 (broader; humanitarian)
- 409 Liability (409 bars only the offer; admissions come in) CEC 1152/1160
- 410 Guilt of defendant Limited completeness/perjury uses CEC 1153
- 411 Negligence/wrongful conduct Bias; agency; ownership; control if disputed CEC 1155
California reaches similar results by different code sections. CEC 1151 excludes subsequent remedial measures but is worded around negligence/culpable conduct; CA courts have been more reluctant to extend it to strict-products design claims (Ault v. International Harvester). CEC 1152 (and 1154 for offers to accept) is BROADER than FRE 408 because it also covers statements and conduct, and CA case law protects 'humanitarian' offers to pay. CEC 1153 mirrors 410 for withdrawn pleas and offers to plead. CEC 1155 bars liability-insurance evidence to prove negligence.
Because these are reliability-and-policy rules rather than relevance rules, Proposition 8 generally does NOT make this excluded evidence admissible in criminal cases where the legislature re-enacted protections, and many of these sections matter mainly in civil litigation anyway.