9.2 Solicitation & the Merger Doctrine

California First-Year Law Students' Examination Baby Bar

Track your progress as you read

Finished sections get a check mark.

1 Introduction & FYLSE Examination Guide

1.1 FYLSE Exam Structure, Passing Standard & Administration 1.2 Study Method, Pacing & MBE-Style Technique

2 Contracts: Mutual Assent, Capacity & Contract Formation

2.1 The Offer & Objective Theory of Assent 2.2 Termination & Irrevocability of Offers 2.3 Acceptance & the Mailbox Rule 2.4 Mirror Image Rule & UCC 2-207 Battle of the Forms 2.5 Mistake in Contract Formation 2.6 Fraud, Duress, Undue Influence & Illegality 2.7 Capacity to Contract

3 Contracts: Consideration, Estoppel & Implied Obligations

3.1 Consideration & the Bargained-For Exchange 3.2 Past & Moral Consideration, Pre-Existing Duty & Modification 3.3 Promissory Estoppel & Detrimental Reliance 3.4 Implied-in-Fact Contracts & Quasi-Contract 3.5 Implied Covenant of Good Faith, Fair Dealing & Indefinite Terms

4 Contracts: Third-Party Beneficiaries, Assignment & Delegation

4.1 Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts 4.2 Assignment of Rights 4.3 Delegation of Duties

5 Contracts: Statute of Frauds, Parol Evidence & Interpretation

5.1 Statute of Frauds: Contracts Within the Statute 5.2 Satisfying the Statute: Writing, Signature & Exceptions 5.3 The Parol Evidence Rule 5.4 Contract Interpretation & Canons of Construction

6 Contracts: Performance, Conditions, UCC Warranties & Breach

6.1 Conditions: Express, Constructive & Excuse 6.2 Substantial Performance vs. Perfect Tender 6.3 Cure, Rejection, Revocation & Installment Contracts 6.4 UCC Article 2 Warranties & Risk of Loss 6.5 Anticipatory Repudiation & Insecurity

7 Contracts: Remedies, Discharge & Changed Circumstances

7.1 Expectation Damages & Their Limitations 7.2 Reliance, Restitution & Liquidated Damages 7.3 Specific Performance & Injunctive Relief 7.4 UCC Article 2 Buyer's and Seller's Remedies 7.5 Impossibility, Impracticability & Frustration of Purpose 7.6 Discharge by Agreement: Rescission, Novation & Accord and Satisfaction

8 Criminal Law: Principles of Criminal Liability & Mens Rea

8.1 Actus Reus, Voluntary Acts & Omissions 8.2 Criminal Causation & Intervening Causes 8.3 Common Law & Model Penal Code Mens Rea 8.4 Mistake of Fact, Mistake of Law & Concurrence

9 Criminal Law: Inchoate Offenses & Accomplice Liability

9.1 Criminal Attempt & Impossibility 9.2 Solicitation & the Merger Doctrine 9.3 Conspiracy & Merger Doctrine 9.4 Accomplice Liability: Actus Reus & Mens Rea 9.5 Scope of Accomplice Liability, Withdrawal & Parties to Crime

10 Criminal Law: Homicide & Crimes Against the Person

10.1 Common Law Murder & Malice Aforethought 10.2 Degrees of Murder, Premeditation & Deliberation 10.3 The Felony Murder Rule & Its Limitations 10.4 Voluntary & Involuntary Manslaughter 10.5 Non-Homicide Crimes Against the Person

11 Criminal Law: Property Crimes, Theft & Habitation

11.1 Common Law Larceny 11.2 Embezzlement & False Pretenses 11.3 Robbery & Extortion 11.4 Receiving Stolen Property 11.5 Burglary 11.6 Arson

12 Criminal Law: Defenses: Capacity, Justification & Excuse

12.1 Insanity: The Four Legal Tests 12.2 Intoxication, Diminished Capacity & Infancy 12.3 Self-Defense & Defense of Others 12.4 Defense of Property, Habitation & Law Enforcement Privileges 12.5 Duress & Necessity 12.6 Entrapment & Mistake as an Excuse

13 Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons & Property

13.1 Intent, Motive & Incapacity in Intentional Torts 13.2 Transferred Intent 13.3 Battery & Assault 13.4 False Imprisonment 13.5 Trespass to Land 13.6 Trespass to Chattels & Conversion

14 Torts: Privileges & Defenses to Intentional Torts

14.1 Consent: Express, Implied & Capacity 14.2 Exceeding & Vitiating Consent 14.3 Self-Defense & Defense of Others (Tort) 14.4 Defense of Property & Recapture of Chattels 14.5 Public & Private Necessity 14.6 The Shopkeeper's Privilege

15 Torts: Negligence — Duty of Care & Breach

15.1 Duty of Care & the Foreseeable Plaintiff 15.2 Affirmative Duties to Act & Special Relationships 15.3 Standard of Care: The Reasonable Person & Children 15.4 Professional Negligence, Informed Consent & Negligence Per Se 15.5 Land Possessor Liability & Premises Duties 15.6 Breach of Duty & Res Ipsa Loquitur

16 Torts: Causation, Defenses, Multiple Tortfeasors, Wrongful Death & Damages

16.1 Cause in Fact & Multiple Actors 16.2 Proximate Cause & Intervening Forces 16.3 Contributory, Comparative Negligence & Assumption of Risk 16.4 Joint and Several Liability, Contribution & Indemnity 16.5 Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duties 16.6 Wrongful Death & Survival Actions 16.7 Statute of Limitations & Claim Accrual 16.8 Tort Damages: Compensatory, Nominal, Punitive & Mitigation

17 Torts: Strict Liability & Products Liability

17.1 Strict Liability for Animals 17.2 Abnormally Dangerous Activities & Scope of Risk 17.3 Strict Products Liability & Defect Categories 17.4 Products Liability Under Negligence, Warranty & Misrepresentation 17.5 Defenses to Products Liability

18 Torts: Emotional Distress, Defamation, Privacy & Economic Torts

18.1 Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 18.2 Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress 18.3 Common Law Defamation: Elements, Libel & Slander 18.4 Constitutional Limits, Privileges & Defenses to Defamation 18.5 Invasion of Privacy 18.6 Nuisance & Economic Torts

9.2 Solicitation & the Merger Doctrine

Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI

Solicitation is complete when the defendant asks, encourages, or commands another to commit a crime with the intent that it be committed, whether or not the other person agrees.

The offense is complete on communication, so the solicited party's refusal is irrelevant, though a communication never received may be only attempted solicitation.

Solicitation merges into the completed crime and into an attempt, so a defendant cannot be convicted of both solicitation and the target offense.

Conspiracy does not merge, so a defendant may be convicted of both conspiracy and the completed substantive crime.

Attempt merges into the completed offense, which is why merger analysis on the FYLSX usually comes down to whether the inchoate crime at issue is conspiracy.

Last updated: September 2026

Solicitation & the Merger Doctrine
VI. Solicitation & The Merger Doctrine

Solicitation is the third recognized inchoate offense. On the FYLSE, solicitation questions frequently overlap with conspiracy and the merger doctrine.

1. Definition and Elements of Solicitation

Solicitation consists of:

Actus Reus: Inciting, counseling, advising, urging, commanding, or requesting another person to commit a felony or serious misdemeanor; with

Mens Rea: The specific intent that the person solicited actually commit the underlying substantive crime.

2. Timing and Nature of the Crime

Instant Completion: Solicitation is complete the exact instant the request or command is communicated to the other person with the requisite specific intent.

Refusal Is Irrelevant: The crime is fully complete even if the person solicited immediately rejects the proposal, scoffs at the solicitor, or turns the solicitor in to the police.

No Agreement Required: Unlike conspiracy, solicitation does not require mutual assent or an agreement. It is a unilateral act.

3. The Merger Doctrine in Inchoate Offenses

The doctrine of merger prevents cumulative punishments where an inchoate offense serves merely as a stepping stone to a completed crime: ┌─────────────────────────────┐

│ The Merger Continuum │
└──────────────┬──────────────┘
│
┌────────────────────────────────────┴────────────────────────────────────┐
▼ ▼
[SOLICITATION] [ATTEMPT]
Merges into CONSPIRACY (if agreed) - Merges into COMPLETED CRIME
Merges into ATTEMPT (if overt act taken) - Cannot be convicted of both
Merges into COMPLETED CRIME (if executed) attempt and target offense
Solicitation NEVER stands alone upon merger - (Conspiracy NEVER merges)

Solicitation Merges into Conspiracy: If the solicited party agrees to commit the crime, the solicitation merges into a criminal conspiracy . The defendant cannot be convicted of both solicitation and conspiracy.

Solicitation Merges into the Target Crime: If the solicited party actually commits the crime, the solicitor becomes an accomplice (party to the crime), and the solicitation merges into the completed substantive offense .

Attempt Merges into the Completed Substantive Offense: An individual cannot be convicted of both an attempt to commit a crime and the completed crime itself. If a burglar successfully enters a home, the attempted burglary merges into the completed burglary.

CRITICAL EXAM DISTINCTION — Conspiracy Never Merges: Unlike attempt and solicitation, conspiracy DOES NOT MERGE into the completed target crime. An individual can be convicted of both conspiracy to commit robbery AND completed robbery.

II. Elements of Solicitation

Solicitation is the least-completed of the inchoate crimes. Nothing need happen beyond the asking.

The act of asking. The defendant counsels, requests, commands, encourages, entices, or urges another person to commit a crime. Any form of inducement qualifies, including an offer of payment.

Specific intent. The defendant must intend that the person solicited actually commit the offense. A statement made in jest, in rhetorical anger, or as a hypothetical lacks this intent.

A crime as the object. At common law solicitation was limited to soliciting a felony or a serious misdemeanor involving a breach of the peace; most modern codes extend it to any crime.

The offense is complete at the moment of communication , and three consequences follow that the examiners test relentlessly:

Refusal is irrelevant. If the person solicited says no, walks away, or reports the request to the police, the solicitation was still complete the instant it was made.

An undercover officer works just as well. The solicited party need not be capable of or willing to commit the crime.

A communication never received — an intercepted letter, an email that bounces — is generally only attempted solicitation, because the inducement never reached its target.

Defenses

At common law, renunciation was no defense : once the words were spoken the crime was done. The Model Penal Code departs from this and allows a defense where the defendant completely and voluntarily renounces the criminal purpose and either persuades the solicited party not to act or otherwise prevents the crime. A renunciation prompted by the appearance of police, or by the discovery that the target is better guarded than expected, is not voluntary.

Note also what solicitation is not : if the solicitor goes further and supplies a weapon, a plan, or a getaway car, and the crime is committed, the solicitor is an accomplice liable for the substantive offense, not merely a solicitor.

III. Working the Merger Question on the Exam

When a fact pattern presents a defendant who asked, agreed, tried, and succeeded, run the chain in order:

Did the defendant ask someone to commit a crime? Solicitation is complete.

Did that person agree? A conspiracy formed, and the solicitation merges into it.

Did anyone take a substantial step? An attempt exists, and the attempt will merge into the completed crime.

Was the crime completed? The attempt and the solicitation are gone. The conspiracy survives.

The single most reliable answer-selection heuristic in this area: an option that convicts a defendant of both conspiracy and the completed offense is very often correct, while an option convicting of both attempt and the completed offense , or both solicitation and the completed offense , is almost always wrong.