Study guide
18.3 Common Law Defamation: Elements, Libel & Slander
California First-Year Law Students' Examination Baby Bar
Track your progress as you read
Finished sections get a check mark.
1 Introduction & FYLSE Examination Guide
1.1 FYLSE Exam Structure, Passing Standard & Administration 1.2 Study Method, Pacing & MBE-Style Technique
2 Contracts: Mutual Assent, Capacity & Contract Formation
2.1 The Offer & Objective Theory of Assent 2.2 Termination & Irrevocability of Offers 2.3 Acceptance & the Mailbox Rule 2.4 Mirror Image Rule & UCC 2-207 Battle of the Forms 2.5 Mistake in Contract Formation 2.6 Fraud, Duress, Undue Influence & Illegality 2.7 Capacity to Contract
3 Contracts: Consideration, Estoppel & Implied Obligations
3.1 Consideration & the Bargained-For Exchange 3.2 Past & Moral Consideration, Pre-Existing Duty & Modification 3.3 Promissory Estoppel & Detrimental Reliance 3.4 Implied-in-Fact Contracts & Quasi-Contract 3.5 Implied Covenant of Good Faith, Fair Dealing & Indefinite Terms
4 Contracts: Third-Party Beneficiaries, Assignment & Delegation
4.1 Third-Party Beneficiary Contracts 4.2 Assignment of Rights 4.3 Delegation of Duties
5 Contracts: Statute of Frauds, Parol Evidence & Interpretation
5.1 Statute of Frauds: Contracts Within the Statute 5.2 Satisfying the Statute: Writing, Signature & Exceptions 5.3 The Parol Evidence Rule 5.4 Contract Interpretation & Canons of Construction
6 Contracts: Performance, Conditions, UCC Warranties & Breach
6.1 Conditions: Express, Constructive & Excuse 6.2 Substantial Performance vs. Perfect Tender 6.3 Cure, Rejection, Revocation & Installment Contracts 6.4 UCC Article 2 Warranties & Risk of Loss 6.5 Anticipatory Repudiation & Insecurity
7 Contracts: Remedies, Discharge & Changed Circumstances
7.1 Expectation Damages & Their Limitations 7.2 Reliance, Restitution & Liquidated Damages 7.3 Specific Performance & Injunctive Relief 7.4 UCC Article 2 Buyer's and Seller's Remedies 7.5 Impossibility, Impracticability & Frustration of Purpose 7.6 Discharge by Agreement: Rescission, Novation & Accord and Satisfaction
8 Criminal Law: Principles of Criminal Liability & Mens Rea
8.1 Actus Reus, Voluntary Acts & Omissions 8.2 Criminal Causation & Intervening Causes 8.3 Common Law & Model Penal Code Mens Rea 8.4 Mistake of Fact, Mistake of Law & Concurrence
9 Criminal Law: Inchoate Offenses & Accomplice Liability
9.1 Criminal Attempt & Impossibility 9.2 Solicitation & the Merger Doctrine 9.3 Conspiracy & Merger Doctrine 9.4 Accomplice Liability: Actus Reus & Mens Rea 9.5 Scope of Accomplice Liability, Withdrawal & Parties to Crime
10 Criminal Law: Homicide & Crimes Against the Person
10.1 Common Law Murder & Malice Aforethought 10.2 Degrees of Murder, Premeditation & Deliberation 10.3 The Felony Murder Rule & Its Limitations 10.4 Voluntary & Involuntary Manslaughter 10.5 Non-Homicide Crimes Against the Person
11 Criminal Law: Property Crimes, Theft & Habitation
11.1 Common Law Larceny 11.2 Embezzlement & False Pretenses 11.3 Robbery & Extortion 11.4 Receiving Stolen Property 11.5 Burglary 11.6 Arson
12 Criminal Law: Defenses: Capacity, Justification & Excuse
12.1 Insanity: The Four Legal Tests 12.2 Intoxication, Diminished Capacity & Infancy 12.3 Self-Defense & Defense of Others 12.4 Defense of Property, Habitation & Law Enforcement Privileges 12.5 Duress & Necessity 12.6 Entrapment & Mistake as an Excuse
13 Torts: Intentional Torts to Persons & Property
13.1 Intent, Motive & Incapacity in Intentional Torts 13.2 Transferred Intent 13.3 Battery & Assault 13.4 False Imprisonment 13.5 Trespass to Land 13.6 Trespass to Chattels & Conversion
14 Torts: Privileges & Defenses to Intentional Torts
14.1 Consent: Express, Implied & Capacity 14.2 Exceeding & Vitiating Consent 14.3 Self-Defense & Defense of Others (Tort) 14.4 Defense of Property & Recapture of Chattels 14.5 Public & Private Necessity 14.6 The Shopkeeper's Privilege
15 Torts: Negligence — Duty of Care & Breach
15.1 Duty of Care & the Foreseeable Plaintiff 15.2 Affirmative Duties to Act & Special Relationships 15.3 Standard of Care: The Reasonable Person & Children 15.4 Professional Negligence, Informed Consent & Negligence Per Se 15.5 Land Possessor Liability & Premises Duties 15.6 Breach of Duty & Res Ipsa Loquitur
16 Torts: Causation, Defenses, Multiple Tortfeasors, Wrongful Death & Damages
16.1 Cause in Fact & Multiple Actors 16.2 Proximate Cause & Intervening Forces 16.3 Contributory, Comparative Negligence & Assumption of Risk 16.4 Joint and Several Liability, Contribution & Indemnity 16.5 Vicarious Liability & Non-Delegable Duties 16.6 Wrongful Death & Survival Actions 16.7 Statute of Limitations & Claim Accrual 16.8 Tort Damages: Compensatory, Nominal, Punitive & Mitigation
17 Torts: Strict Liability & Products Liability
17.1 Strict Liability for Animals 17.2 Abnormally Dangerous Activities & Scope of Risk 17.3 Strict Products Liability & Defect Categories 17.4 Products Liability Under Negligence, Warranty & Misrepresentation 17.5 Defenses to Products Liability
18 Torts: Emotional Distress, Defamation, Privacy & Economic Torts
18.1 Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress 18.2 Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress 18.3 Common Law Defamation: Elements, Libel & Slander 18.4 Constitutional Limits, Privileges & Defenses to Defamation 18.5 Invasion of Privacy 18.6 Nuisance & Economic Torts
18.3 Common Law Defamation: Elements, Libel & Slander
Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI
Common law defamation requires a defamatory statement of fact concerning the plaintiff, publication to at least one third party, and damages, and a statement is defamatory if it tends to harm the plaintiff's reputation so as to lower them in the estimation of the community or deter others from associating with them.
Publication requires only intentional or negligent communication to one third person, and each repetition is a separate publication for which the repeater is liable.
Libel is written or otherwise permanently recorded and general damages are presumed, while slander is spoken and ordinarily requires proof of special pecuniary damages.
The four slander per se categories, which presume damages, are statements imputing a serious crime, a loathsome disease, unchastity, or conduct incompatible with the plaintiff's business or profession.
Only living persons may be defamed, and pure statements of opinion that do not imply undisclosed defamatory facts are not actionable.
Last updated: September 2026
Common Law Defamation: Elements, Libel & Slander
Exam Snapshot: Defamation protects an individual's reputational standing within the community. On the California First-Year Law Students' Examination (FYLSE), examinees must master two interconnected doctrinal dimensions: (1) the common law prima facie elements , including the critical boundary between libel (presumed general damages) and slander (requiring special economic damages unless falling into the four traditional slander per se categories), and (2) the constitutional limitations imposed by the First Amendment under New York Times Co. v. Sullivan and Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. Examinees must readily classify plaintiffs as public officials, public figures, or private figures, identify the appropriate fault standard (actual malice vs. negligence), and apply absolute versus qualified privileges.
1. Common Law Defamation: Prima Facie Elements
At common law, defamation was treated virtually as a strict liability tort: falsity was presumed, damages were often presumed, and liability attached without regard to the defendant's lack of fault. While constitutional jurisprudence has reshaped the landscape for public figures and matters of public concern, the common law foundation remains the starting point for all FYLSE essay and multiple-choice analyses. [ Defamatory Statement of Fact ] + [ Of & Concerning Plaintiff ] + [ Publication to 3rd Party ] + [ Damages / Harm ] = Common Law Defamation
Element Common Law Definition & Legal Benchmark Critical Bar Exam Rules
1. Defamatory Statement A factual statement that tends to diminish the plaintiff's reputation, lower their standing in the community, or deter third persons from associating with them. Pure opinions, rhetorical hyperbole, and vituperative insults are non-actionable unless they imply undisclosed defamatory factual premises.
2. Of & Concerning Plaintiff A reasonable recipient must understand that the defamatory communication refers to the specific plaintiff. Defamation of large groups permits no individual claims; defamation of small groups permits all individual members to sue.
3. Publication Communicated intentionally or negligently to at least one third person (other than plaintiff) who understands its defamatory meaning. No publication if spoken privately to the plaintiff alone with no third parties present. Repeaters are liable as original publishers.
4. Damages Reputational and economic harm resulting from the defamatory publication. Libel: General damages are presumed.; Slander: Special economic damages required, unless Slander Per Se .
- 2. In-Depth Doctrinal Analysis of Common Law Elements
- Element 1: Defamatory Statement of Fact
The communication must be defamatory in character—meaning it tends to expose the plaintiff to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or financial injury, or causes others to shun or avoid them:
Fact vs. Opinion: Statements of pure opinion, imaginative hyperbole, or loose subjective rhetoric (e.g., calling someone an "arrogant jerk" or "incompetent buffoon") are constitutionally and legally protected. However, an opinion that reasonably implies underlying, undisclosed defamatory facts (e.g., "In my medical opinion, Dr. Davis should not perform surgery because he is an active alcoholic" ) is treated as an actionable statement of fact.
Pleading Colloquium, Inducement, and Innuendo:
If a statement is defamatory on its face ( defamation per se at common law), no extrinsic facts are required.
If the defamatory character is not apparent on its face ( defamation per quod ), the plaintiff must plead extrinsic facts ( inducement ), establish that the recipient understood the reference applied to the plaintiff ( colloquium ), and explain the hidden defamatory meaning ( innuendo ).
Element 2: "Of and Concerning" the Plaintiff & Group Defamation
The plaintiff must prove that a reasonable listener or reader would understand the statement as referring to them specifically:
Individual Identification: The plaintiff need not be named explicitly if recipients familiar with the circumstances reasonably identify the plaintiff from descriptions, nicknames, or context.
The Group Defamation Rules:
Large Group Rule: If a defamatory statement targets a large, amorphous class ( "All criminal defense attorneys are dishonest shysters" or "All used car salesmen roll back odometers" ), no individual member of the class can maintain an action because the assertion cannot reasonably be understood as directed at any specific person.
Small Group Rule: If a statement defames a small, well-defined group ( "One of the four partners in this medical practice is committing billing fraud" ), every individual member of the group has standing to sue , because suspicion is cast equally upon each member.
Element 3: Publication & Republication
Publication is a term of legal art requiring communication to at least one person other than the plaintiff who hears or reads the statement and comprehends its defamatory significance:
Mental State for Publication: The communication must be made either intentionally or negligently . If an actor speaks defamatory words to the plaintiff in a locked, private room, and an unexpected trespasser secretly wiretaps the room, there is no publication because the disclosure was neither intentional nor negligent. Conversely, sending a defamatory message on an open postcard or loudly shouting in a crowded hallway satisfies publication.
The Republication Rule: Anyone who repeats or republishes a defamatory communication is subject to liability to the same extent as the original author. Qualifying a repeated rumor with "I don't know if this is true, but I heard that..." provides zero legal defense.
3. Libel vs. Slander & The Slander Per Se Categories
The form in which the defamatory statement is embodied determines the plaintiff's burden regarding proof of damages: Common Law Defamation Damages
- ├── Libel (Permanent / Recorded Form: Written, Print, Broadcast, Digital) ──▶ GENERAL DAMAGES PRESUMED
- └── Slander (Oral / Spoken / Transitory Form)
- ├── Slander Per Quod (Ordinary Slander) ──▶ MUST PROVE SPECIAL DAMAGES (Economic / Pecuniary Loss)
- └── Slander Per Se (Four Specialized Categories) ──▶ GENERAL DAMAGES PRESUMED (No special damages needed)
- Libel (Presumed General Damages)
Libel encompasses written, printed, or permanently embodied communications, including newspapers, letters, books, photographs, internet postings, radio broadcasts, and television transmissions ( Restatement (Second) of Torts § 568 ):
Because permanent or broadcast communications have enduring presence and vast potential reach, the common law presumes general damages as a matter of law .
The plaintiff is not required to prove specific out-of-pocket economic loss; the factfinder may award general compensatory damages for reputational impairment, emotional distress, and humiliation.
Slander (Oral Defamation)
Slander is spoken, oral, or transitory defamatory communication:
Slander Per Quod (General Rule): The plaintiff cannot recover general damages unless the plaintiff affirmatively pleads and proves special damages .
What Constitutes Special Damages? Special damages are quantifiable, out-of-pocket pecuniary (economic) losses directly caused by the reputational harm—such as being fired from employment, losing a lucrative commercial contract, or suffering a measurable drop in paying customers. Hurt feelings, social embarrassment, or psychological distress do not constitute special damages.
Slander Per Se: The Four Presumed Damage Categories
If an oral defamatory statement falls within one of four specialized categories, the law recognizes that reputational injury is so immediate and devastating that damages are presumed as a matter of law , excusing the plaintiff from proving special economic loss:
Slander Per Se Category Legal Definition & Scope Classic FYLSE Scenario
1. Loathsome Disease Historically limited to currently active, contagious, and socially stigmatizing communicable diseases (leprosy, venereal disease). Orally telling neighbors that a schoolteacher has active, untreated syphilis.
2. Crime of Moral Turpitude Falsely imputing commission of a criminal offense involving moral baseness, dishonesty, fraud, or serious felony imprisonment. Orally asserting that a neighbor is an embezzler, a burglar, a perjurer, or a drug trafficker.
3. Unfitness in Business / Profession Falsely alleging incompetence, dishonesty, lack of integrity, or misconduct that directly touches and prejudices the plaintiff's trade, profession, office, or business. Orally declaring that an active licensed surgeon performs operations while intoxicated, or that an attorney steals client retainer funds.
4. Serious Sexual Misconduct Historically framed as imputing unchastity to an unmarried woman; modernly encompasses serious sexual misconduct or sexual crimes. Orally accusing a colleague of engaging in predatory sexual assault or prostitution.
Exam Trap: Falsely stating orally that a merchant is rude, obnoxious, or ungenerous does not constitute slander per se, because bad manners do not touch professional competence or impute a crime of moral turpitude. The merchant would be required to prove special economic loss (slander per quod) to recover.