11.3 Analytic Scoring Rubric for Written Expression

DELE B1 — Spanish Language Diploma Intermediate

Track your progress as you read

Finished sections get a check mark.

1 Chapter 1: Exam Structure, Logistics, & Scoring System

1.1 DELE B1 Qualification & CEFR Standards 1.2 Four Pruebas Format, Timing, & Administration 1.3 Scoring System: Two Groups & the 30/50 Threshold Rule

2 Chapter 2: Essential B1 Grammar — Past Tenses & Narrative Control

2.1 Pretérito Indefinido vs. Pretérito Imperfecto 2.2 Pretérito Perfecto & Pretérito Pluscuamperfecto 2.3 Habitual Actions, Time Markers, & Duration Structures

3 Chapter 3: Essential B1 Grammar — The Subjunctive Mood

3.1 Present Subjunctive Formation & Irregular Stems 3.2 Subjunctive with Wishes, Influence, & Emotions 3.3 Impersonal Expressions & Future Temporal Clauses

4 Chapter 4: B1 Sentence Structure, Connectors, & Syntax

4.1 Discourse Connectors & Textual Cohesion 4.2 Direct & Indirect Object Pronouns & Combination 4.3 Ser vs. Estar, Por vs. Para, & Verbal Periphrases

5 Chapter 5: B1 Thematic Lexicon & Sociolinguistic Domains

5.1 Daily Life, Housing, & Neighborhood Services 5.2 Work, Education, & Professional Communication 5.3 Travel, Leisure, Health, & Environmental Awareness

6 Chapter 6: Prueba 1 — Reading Comprehension: Matching & Text Analysis

6.1 Tarea 1: Matching Candidate Profiles to Short Notices 6.2 Tarea 2: Extended Informative Text Multiple-Choice 6.3 Tarea 3: Locating Specific Information Across Three Texts

7 Chapter 7: Prueba 1 — Reading Comprehension: Cloze & Linguistic Precision

7.1 Tarea 4: Gapped Text Fragment Insertion 7.2 Tarea 5: Grammar & Vocabulary Cloze 7.3 Reading Time Management & Distractor Traps

8 Chapter 8: Prueba 2 — Listening Comprehension: Announcements & Monologues

8.1 Tarea 1: Short Announcements & Advertisements 8.2 Tarea 2: Extended Personal Monologue 8.3 Tarea 3: Radio News Bulletins & Specific Facts

9 Chapter 9: Prueba 2 — Listening Comprehension: Conversations & Multiple Speakers

9.1 Tarea 4: Multiple Speaker Matching on a Common Theme 9.2 Tarea 5: Informal Everyday Dialogue 9.3 Active Listening Techniques & Double-Listen Protocol

10 Chapter 10: Prueba 3 — Written Expression: Interaction & Correspondence

10.1 Tarea 1: Letters, Emails, & Forum Responses 10.2 Register, Salutations, & Sign-Off Formulas 10.3 Word Count Management (100–120 Words) & Error Prevention

11 Chapter 11: Prueba 3 — Written Expression: Narrative & Opinion Composition

11.1 Tarea 2: Choosing a Prompt and Following Its Genre 11.2 Structuring a 130–150 Word Narrative or Opinion Essay 11.3 Analytic Scoring Rubric for Written Expression

12 Chapter 12: Prueba 4 — Oral Expression: Monologue & Follow-Up Discussion

12.1 The 15-Minute Preparation Period & Note-Taking Strategy 12.2 Tarea 1: 2–3 Minute Prepared Monologue 12.3 Tarea 2: Interactive Discussion with the Examiner

13 Chapter 13: Prueba 4 — Oral Expression: Photo Description & Role-Play

13.1 Tarea 3: Photograph Description & Guided Follow-Up 13.2 Tarea 4: Spontaneous Everyday Role-Play Simulation 13.3 Oral Evaluation Rubric (Holistic vs. Analytic) & Fluency

11.3 Analytic Scoring Rubric for Written Expression

Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI

Writing uses 0–3 holistic and analytic ratings, contributing 40% and 60% respectively.

The four analytic criteria are Adecuación al género discursivo, Coherencia, Corrección and Alcance.

The two writing tasks have equal weight in the analytic component.

Writing combines with Reading in Grupo 1, which requires at least 30/50.

Neither a connector quota nor one compulsory tense guarantees a rating.

Last updated: October 2026

Writing Is Rated Analytically and Holistically

The written test is worth 25 points and contains two responses: Task 1, 100–120 words, and Task 2, 130–150 words. Trained raters use 0–3 scales . The official guide describes a holistic and an analytic rating for each task; the final weighting is 40% holistic and 60% analytic , with equal weighting for the two tasks in the analytic component.

Do not confuse the 40/60 distinction with the two task numbers. Task 2 is longer, but that does not make it “60% of writing” under the published rule. Nor does a collection of attractive expressions earn an automatic band. The ratings describe the communicative performance as a whole and its component qualities.

Four Analytic Criteria

Official criterion What to inspect in practice A useful revision

Adecuación al género discursivo Purpose, audience, genre and treatment of the required content Supply a missing reason or adjust the tone to the recipient

Coherencia Organization, sequencing and links between ideas Add a clear reference or move a sentence to its logical place

Corrección Grammatical and orthographic control Repair a wrong tense, agreement or accent

Alcance Resources available to express the intended meanings Replace a vague repetition with accurate topic vocabulary or a paraphrase

These are interacting dimensions. An appropriate greeting cannot replace the requested explanation; correct grammar cannot supply missing content. A longer word is not necessarily more precise, and a complex structure used incorrectly can make a simple message harder to follow.

Task and Genre Adequacy

Start by describing the assignment in one sentence: I am replying to a friend to explain why I cannot attend and propose another date . Read your response and ask whether the recipient could act on it. If no alternative date appears, the text has not completed that part of the communicative job.

Use all guiding points as a checklist and develop them enough for the reader to understand. In the published genre-adequacy scale, Band 3 develops all the requested points effectively. Band 2 allows clear development of the great majority, even if one is absent or inadequately treated. Band 1 describes insufficient development of only some points. A single omission therefore does not impose an automatic Band 1 cap or an overall examination failure.

The Band 0 genre-adequacy descriptor specifically lists texts below 70 words in Task 1 or 90 words in Task 2 among its severe deficiencies. These figures are not target lengths or permission to ignore the requested 100–120 and 130–150 words. Ratings in a criterion and the final group-based pass decision are distinct.

Respect the requested length. No universal ±10% exemption or fixed stopping rule is established here. If short, add relevant content; if long, remove repetition. A greeting belongs in a letter but not necessarily in every diary entry or composition. Choose tú , usted or another appropriate standard form consistently for the actual audience.

Coherence: Make Relationships Visible

A coherent response has an order that the reader can follow. A story may move from setting to event to outcome; an inquiry may move from purpose to specific questions to closing. Paragraphs help when they group meaningful units. They do not need to have identical lengths.

Compare Fui al pueblo. Llovía. Perdí el autobús. Mi amiga vino . The facts are present, but their relationship is uncertain. Como perdí el último autobús y llovía mucho, llamé a mi amiga. Poco después vino a recogerme explains the sequence and cause.

Use pronouns only when the reference is clear. In Mi hermana habló con Ana cuando ella llegó , the reader may not know who arrived. Repeating the name is better than avoiding repetition at the expense of meaning. Similarly, por eso needs a reason in the surrounding text and sin embargo needs a contrast. There is no required quota of four connectors.

Correction: Diagnose Patterns

Look for recurring errors rather than treating every slip as a fixed point deduction. If a response repeatedly writes la gente son , practice singular agreement with a new sentence: La gente de mi barrio es amable . If it writes ayer he ido in a context requiring a closed-past narrative for the variety being used, review temporal reference and regional usage rather than imposing a blanket rule on every Spanish speaker.

Check high-frequency verb forms, noun-adjective agreement, object pronouns, governed prepositions and written accents. Compare me lo dijo with lo me dijo , and me acuerdo de la fecha with me acuerdo la fecha . Read the entire corrected sentence to ensure that grammar and intended meaning both work.

B1 does not require error-free native writing. The official descriptors distinguish degrees of control and communicative clarity. One missing accent does not automatically determine the band, just as one correct subjunctive does not guarantee the highest rating.

Range: Express the Intended Idea

Range concerns the resources you can use to communicate. Specific vocabulary can help: organizamos una cena de despedida gives more information than hicimos una cosa . But tener problemas and poner una queja are normal expressions; replacing them with unnecessarily bureaucratic synonyms does not automatically improve an email to a friend.

When you do not know a word, paraphrase accurately. El lugar donde guardamos las maletas can communicate a luggage-storage idea. Then add consigna to your vocabulary log after the exercise. Reuse it in a new sentence later, so it becomes an available resource rather than a word copied once from a model.

Vary sentence types only when they serve the task. Description may need hay and estar ; a request may need quisiera saber ; a reaction may need me alegra que . Matching resources to communicative needs is more useful than forcing a passive construction into every response.

Holistic Judgment and Score Illustration

After the analytic review, read the response as a recipient. Does it work as a message? Can you identify its purpose and follow its meaning without reconstructing missing links? This overall judgment complements the four analytic dimensions; it is not a fifth independent vocabulary checklist.

For an illustration of the weighting, suppose the relevant holistic and analytic averages are both 2 on the 0–3 scale. The weighted mean is 0.40 × 2 + 0.60 × 2 = 2. Scaling gives 2 × 25 ÷ 3 = 16.67 points . This is a mathematical example, not a predicted official result for an unassessed script.

Writing combines with Reading in Grupo 1 , whose minimum is 30/50 . Listening combines with Speaking in Grupo 2, also requiring 30/50. You must pass both groups in the same session. There is no separate universal writing cutoff of 15 points and no way to transfer spare writing points to Grupo 2.

A Productive Feedback Cycle

Write a complete response under time conditions. Check its required points and word count, then review it against the four criteria and overall communicative success. Choose two changes that most improve meaning, produce a revised version and attempt a fresh prompt a few days later. Keep the first draft so that you can distinguish better language control from merely polishing one memorized text. Use the official scoring guide for the full descriptors; the explanations here are independent teaching summaries.