Study guide
4.4 Training & Experience (T&E) Evaluations, Point-Factor Scoring & Supplemental Questionnaires
PSHRA Certified Professional PSHRA-CP
Track your progress as you read
Finished sections get a check mark.
1 Chapter 1: Introduction to Public Sector HR & Merit Systems
1.1 PSHRA-CP Exam Structure, Public Sector HR Foundations & Merit Principles 1.2 Historical Evolution: Spoils System, Pendleton Act & Civil Service Reform Act of 1978 1.3 The 9 Statutory Merit System Principles & Civil Service Administration 1.4 Prohibited Personnel Practices (5 U.S.C. § 2302) & Whistleblower Protection
2 Chapter 2: Job Analysis & Minimum Qualifications
2.1 Public Sector Job Analysis Methods: Task Inventories, Functional Job Analysis & O*NET 2.2 KSAO Development, Essential Functions & Duty-to-KSAO Linkage Matrices 2.3 Establishing Job-Related Minimum Qualifications & Screening Thresholds 2.4 Crafting Public Sector Job Descriptions, Class Specifications & FLSA/ADA Compliance
3 Chapter 3: Recruitment Strategy, Sourcing & Diversity
3.1 Public Sector Sourcing & Outreach to Underrepresented Groups 3.2 Job Announcements, Examination Bulletins & EEO Compliance 3.3 Open-Competitive vs. Promotional Hiring Paths 3.4 Pathways Programs, Internships & Apprenticeships in Government
4 Chapter 4: Competitive Testing & Selection Instruments
4.1 Written & Computer-Based Job Knowledge and Cognitive Ability Testing in Civil Service 4.2 Work Sample Tests, Performance Simulations, Assessment Centers & Physical Ability Tests 4.3 Structured Interviewing, Behavior Description (BDI), Situational (SI) & Panel Standardization 4.4 Training & Experience (T&E) Evaluations, Point-Factor Scoring & Supplemental Questionnaires
5 Chapter 5: Test Validation, Psychometrics & Adverse Impact
5.1 Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP 1978) & Validation Standards 5.2 Content, Criterion-Related (Predictive/Concurrent), and Construct Validity in Public Selection 5.3 Test Reliability Metrics, Standard Error of Measurement, Cut Scores & Banding 5.4 Four-Fifths (80%) Rule, Disparate Impact Analysis, Standard Deviation Rule & Adverse Impact Remediation
6 Chapter 6: Candidate Ranking, Certification & Selection
6.1 Civil Service Certification: Traditional Rule-of-Three vs. Modern Category Rating Systems 6.2 Veterans' Preference Points, Preference Categories & Pass-Over Procedures 6.3 Eligible Lists, Order of Precedence, Canvassing & Selective Certification 6.4 The Probationary Period, Rejection During Probation & Due Process Protections
7 Chapter 7: Public Sector Employment Law & Compliance
7.1 Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, EEOC Procedures, Pattern or Practice & Public Agency EEO Compliance 7.2 ADA/ADAAA in Public Sector: Essential Functions, Reasonable Accommodation Interactive Dialogue & Undue Hardship Standards 7.3 FMLA, FLSA Overtime/Comp Time Rules (29 U.S.C. § 207(o)), Pregnant Workers Fairness Act & PUMP Act 7.4 Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), GINA, USERRA Military Leave Protections & 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Actions
8 Chapter 8: Constitutional Law, Public Ethics & Documentation
8.1 Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process: Property/Liberty Interests & Pre-Disciplinary Loudermill Rights 8.2 First Amendment Speech & Association: Pickering-Connick Public Concern Test, Garcetti Official Duty Rule & Political Patronage Bans 8.3 Fourth Amendment Privacy: O'Connor v. Ortega Workplace Searches, Special Needs Drug Testing & Electronic Monitoring 8.4 The Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 7321-7326), State 'Little Hatch Acts', Public Records/FOIA & Conflict of Interest Codes 8.5 Personnel Policy Development, Administrative Rulemaking & HR Documentation Standards
9 Chapter 9: Public Sector Labor Relations & Collective Bargaining
9.1 Public Sector Labor Frameworks: CSRA Title VII, Federal Labor Relations Authority & State Public Employment Relations Boards (PERBs) 9.2 Bargaining Unit Determination, Community of Interest, Certification Elections & Duty of Fair Representation 9.3 Scope of Bargaining: Mandatory, Permissive, Prohibited Subjects, Management Rights & Impact/Implementation Bargaining 9.4 Impasse Resolution: Mediation, Fact-Finding, Interest Arbitration, Right-to-Strike Bans & Post-Janus v. AFSCME Agency Fee Landscape
10 Chapter 10: Discipline, Grievances & Performance Management
10.1 The Just Cause Standard: Daugherty's Seven Tests of Just Cause in Public Agency Discipline 10.2 Progressive Discipline Hierarchy, Written Reprimands to Discharges, Loudermill Notice and Hearing Execution 10.3 Contractual and Civil Service Grievance Procedures, Step Escalation, MSPB Appeals & Binding Rights Arbitration 10.4 Public Sector Performance Appraisal Systems, Standards Alignment, Performance Improvement Plans (PIPs) & Unacceptable Performance Removals (5 U.S.C. Ch. 43 vs Ch. 75)
11 Chapter 11: Job Classification & Compensation Systems
11.1 Public Sector Job Evaluation: Point-Factor Systems, Factor Evaluation System (FES) & Position Description Audits 11.2 General Schedule (GS) Grade-and-Step Mechanics, Locality Pay, Special Rates, Broadbanding & Career Ladders 11.3 Conducting Market Salary Surveys, Benchmark Positioning, Compa-Ratios & Balancing External Competitiveness with Internal Equity 11.4 FLSA Exemption Audits (Executive, Administrative, Professional), Public Comp Time Accrual/Payouts & 7(k) Public Safety Rules 11.5 Equal Pay Act in Public Agencies, Pay Transparency Statutes, Salary History Bans & Structural Compression Resolution
12 Chapter 12: Employee Benefits & Total Rewards in Government
12.1 Public Pension Systems: FERS vs. CSRS, State/Local Defined Benefit Formulas, Vesting & Post-Retirement COLAs 12.2 Government Deferred Compensation: Section 457(b) Eligible Plans, 401(a) Defined Contribution & Catch-Up Provisions 12.3 Federal Employees Health Benefits (FEHB) & Public Agency Group Health, FSAs, HSAs & Employee Wellness Programs 12.4 Other Post-Employment Benefits (OPEB), GASB 74/75 Reporting Liabilities, Public Disability & Life Insurance Systems
13 Chapter 13: HRIS, Workforce Analytics & Public Administration
13.1 Public Sector HRIS Architecture, Enterprise ERP Integration, Civil Service ATS Platforms & Compliant Onboarding 13.2 Core Public HR Metrics: Time-to-Hire, Turnover Rates, Cost-per-Hire, Diversity Indices & Civil Service Reporting 13.3 Government Workforce & Succession Planning: Demographic Cliff, Retirement Forecasting, Knowledge Transfer & Leadership Continuity 13.4 Public HR Data Security, PII Protection, Records Retention Schedules, FOIA/Public Records Compliance & Audit Readiness
4.4 Training & Experience (T&E) Evaluations, Point-Factor Scoring & Supplemental Questionnaires
Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI
Training and Experience (T&E) evaluations systematically convert an applicant's education, certifications, and work history into competitive merit scores.
While traditional Credential Counting exhibits low predictive validity (r ≈ 0.10–0.20), the Behavioral Consistency T&E method achieves substantially higher validity (r ≈ 0.45) by evaluating past major achievements against critical job competencies.
Point-Factor and Supplemental Questionnaires must be directly derived from job analysis KSAOs, utilize graduated behavioral levels, and incorporate mandatory verification audits to combat applicant over-inflation.
Civil service rules require transparent scoring rubrics, formal appeal mechanisms, and strict record retention for T&E evaluations under UGESP standards.
Last updated: August 2026
Training & Experience (T&E) Evaluations, Point-Factor Scoring & Supplemental Questionnaires
Core Principle: In public sector recruitment, Training and Experience (T&E) evaluations serve as formal competitive examinations. Rather than being passive resume reviews, T&E instruments systematically score applicant qualifications against predetermined, job-related criteria derived directly from formal job analysis.
Public HR departments frequently face high-volume recruitments for professional, administrative, or specialized technical classifications where administering an in-person written test or assessment center is logistically impractical or cost-prohibitive. In these situations, civil service commissions deploy Training and Experience (T&E) Evaluations as the competitive examination of record to rank-order candidates on eligible lists.
Methodologies of T&E Evaluation
Not all T&E evaluations are created equal. Industrial-organizational research demonstrates dramatic differences in psychometric validity across various T&E models.
T&E Evaluation Method Operational Mechanics Psychometric Validity ( r r r ) Best Applied In
Holistic Credential Review Evaluators conduct an unstructured review of resumes/applications against general qualification guidelines. Low ( r ≈ 0.10 − 0.15 r \approx 0.10 - 0.15 r ≈ 0.10 − 0.15 ) Basic minimum qualification (MQ) screening only; not defensible as a scored exam
Point-Factor / Rating Schedule Method Explicit point values are awarded for specific increments of accredited education, certifications, and years of specialized experience exceeding MQs. Low to Moderate ( r ≈ 0.15 − 0.22 r \approx 0.15 - 0.22 r ≈ 0.15 − 0.22 ) High-volume entry/journey-level civil service lists where experience quantity correlates with basic readiness
Grouping / Category Method Candidates are placed into broad qualification tiers (e.g., Highly Qualified, Well Qualified, Qualified) based on defined experiential thresholds. Moderate ( r ≈ 0.25 − 0.30 r \approx 0.25 - 0.30 r ≈ 0.25 − 0.30 ) Category Rating systems (5 U.S.C. § 3319) in federal and state merit hiring
Behavioral Consistency Method (Schmidt & Caplan) Applicants submit detailed narrative descriptions of their top 2–3 past work achievements for specific KSAO competencies; SMEs score narratives using BARS. High ( r ≈ 0.45 r \approx 0.45 r ≈ 0.45 ) Senior professional, technical, administrative, and managerial civil service classifications
Supplemental Questionnaire / Task-Based Self-Assessment Applicants rate their frequency and skill level on specific job tasks, supported by mandatory narrative justifications and employer verification audits. Moderate to High ( r ≈ 0.35 − 0.42 r \approx 0.35 - 0.42 r ≈ 0.35 − 0.42 with audit controls) Modern automated applicant tracking systems (e.g., NeoGov, USAJOBS)
The Behavioral Consistency Method: Gold Standard in T&E
Developed by Frank Schmidt and colleagues, the Behavioral Consistency T&E Method is recognized as the most psychometrically valid and legally defensible T&E examination technique.
Core Tenets of Behavioral Consistency:
Competency Identification: Job analysis identifies 4 to 6 critical competencies where past achievement differentiates superior from average performance.
Achievement Narratives: Applicants complete a structured Achievement Record . For each competency, the applicant describes:
The specific situation or challenge faced.
What they personally did (actions taken).
The verifiable outcome or impact (metrics, cost savings, policy implemented).
The names and contact details of supervisors who can verify the achievement.
SME Scoring with Benchmarks: Two independent Subject Matter Experts rate the narratives using detailed scoring rubrics with concrete behavioral benchmarks, achieving high inter-rater reliability. +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | POINT-FACTOR SCORING ARCHITECTURE FOR T&E EXAMS |
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS BASELINE (PASS/FAIL HURDLE): |
- | Bachelor's Degree + 3 Years Professional HR Experience = BASELINE ELIGIBILITY |
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- │
- ▼
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | POINT-FACTOR ADD-ONS (MAXIMUM 100 POINTS): |
- | |
- | 1. RELEVANT EDUCATION BEYOND MQ (Max 20 Points): |
- | • Master's Degree in HR / Public Administration / Industrial Relations: 20 pts |
- | • Post-Graduate Certificate in Public Management: 10 pts |
- | |
- | 2. PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS (Max 15 Points): |
- | • PSHRA-CP / PSHRA-SCP / SHRM-CP / SPHR: 15 pts |
- | • IPMA-HR / Professional Workplace Investigator Credential: 10 pts |
- | |
- | 3. SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE BEYOND MQ (Max 45 Points): |
- | • 1-2 additional years lead/supervisory HR experience: 15 pts |
- | • 3-4 additional years lead/supervisory HR experience: 30 pts |
- | • 5+ additional years lead/supervisory HR experience: 45 pts |
- | |
- | 4. SUPPLEMENTAL TECHNICAL COMPETENCY QUESTIONNAIRE (Max 20 Points): |
- | • SME-scored technical writing / labor contract analysis sample: 20 pts |
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- │
- ▼
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- | TOTAL RAW T&E SCORE (Scaled to 70.00 - 100.00 Passing Score on Register) |
- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------+
- Designing Defensible Supplemental Questionnaires
Automated Supplemental Questionnaires are widely utilized in public sector Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS). To maintain merit integrity and withstand legal challenge, they must be constructed with rigorous psychometric safeguards.
Best Practices for Questionnaire Design:
Graduated Behavioral Options: Avoid binary Yes/No questions. Use 4- or 5-level behavioral frequency/proficiency scales:
Level A: I have no training or experience in this task.
Level B: I have completed educational or classroom training in this task, but have not performed it on the job.
Level C: I have performed this task under direct supervision or guidance.
Level D: I have performed this task independently as a regular, core duty of my job.
Level E: I have served as a lead worker, expert, or supervisor, training others in this task.
Mandatory Narrative Substantiation: For every response at Level C, D, or E, the applicant must provide a text narrative identifying: (a) the employer where the experience was gained, (b) the specific job title held, and (c) the exact duties performed.
Applicant Warning & Truth-in-Application Certification: Applicants must sign an explicit certification stating that over-inflation, exaggeration, or misrepresentation will result in immediate disqualification, removal from the eligible list, or termination of employment.
HR & SME Verification Audits: Prior to certifying the final list, HR analysts or SMEs audit a sample of high-scoring questionnaires against the applicant's official work history and transcripts, adjusting inflated scores downward before finalizing rankings.
Legal Defensibility, Record Retention & Appeals
T&E examinations are subject to the same legal standards under UGESP (29 CFR Part 1607) and state civil service laws as written examinations.
Administrative & Legal Defensibility Rules:
Job-Relatedness: Points can only be awarded for education, certifications, and experience that have a documented direct linkage to the KSAOs established in the formal job analysis.
Objective Scoring Keys: The scoring key and point allocations must be established and frozen before applications are opened and inspected, preventing favoritism or tailored scoring.
Appeal Process: Civil service rules typically grant applicants a formal examination appeal period (e.g., 10 to 14 calendar days from score notification) to challenge their T&E score. The agency must provide the scoring rubric and written explanation of point determinations upon request.
Document Retention: All applicant submissions, rating sheets, SME notes, and scoring keys must be retained for a minimum of two years (or statutory state retention schedules) for Title VII / EEOC compliance.