Diastolic Function Grading (ASE/EACVI 2016)

RDCS Adult Echocardiography AE

Track your progress as you read

Finished sections get a check mark.

1 Introduction & Exam Overview

The RDCS AE Exam, SPI Requirement & Logistics Content Outline, Domain Weights & How to Study

2 Cardiac Anatomy

Chambers, Walls, Myocardial Layers & the 17-Segment Model Cardiac Valves & Subvalvular Apparatus Great Vessels, Pericardium, Coronary & Venous Anatomy

3 Cardiac Physiology & Hemodynamics

Cardiac Cycle, Phases & Pressure-Volume Relationships Normal Systolic & Diastolic Function Hemodynamic Principles & Response to Stress

4 Echo Modalities, Instrumentation & Contrast

2D (B-Mode) and M-Mode Imaging Spectral, Color, and Tissue Doppler Modalities Image Optimization, Artifacts, and Contrast Echocardiography

5 Standard Views, Windows & Protocol

Parasternal Long- & Short-Axis Views Apical Views Subcostal & Suprasternal-Notch Views Exam Protocol, Patient Positioning & Provocative Maneuvers

6 Quantification & Doppler Hemodynamic Calculations

Chamber Quantification: LV, LA, RA, and RV Size, Mass, and Volumes Systolic Function: Ejection Fraction Methods, Fractional Shortening & Strain Diastolic Function Grading (ASE/EACVI 2016) Core Doppler Math: Modified Bernoulli, VTI, Stroke Volume & the Continuity Equation Advanced Hemodynamics: PISA/EROA, Pressure Half-Time, dP/dt, Qp/Qs & RVSP

7 Aortic & Mitral Valve Disease

Aortic Stenosis Aortic Regurgitation Mitral Stenosis Mitral Regurgitation

8 Right-Sided, Prosthetic & Infective Valve Disease

Tricuspid & Pulmonic Valve Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment Infective Endocarditis and Vegetations Prosthetic Valves and Postoperative Evaluation

9 Ischemic Disease & Cardiomyopathies

Coronary Anatomy, Ischemic Heart Disease & Wall-Motion Abnormalities Stress Echocardiography & Myocardial Viability Mechanical Complications of Myocardial Infarction Dilated & Restrictive Cardiomyopathy Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, SAM & LVOT Obstruction

10 Pericardial Disease, Masses & Aorta

Pericardial Effusion & Cardiac Tamponade Constrictive Pericarditis vs. Restrictive Physiology Cardiac Masses, Tumors & Thrombi Aortic Disease: Aneurysm, Dissection & Atheroma

11 Congenital Heart Disease & Shunts

Septal Defects & Shunt Quantification Common Adult Congenital Lesions

12 Clinical Care & Safety

Patient Care, Clinical-Data Integration & Exam Protocols Bioeffects, ALARA, Infection Control & Ergonomics

Diastolic Function Grading (ASE/EACVI 2016)

Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI

The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm for patients with normal EF uses four variables: septal e' <7 cm/s, lateral e' <10 cm/s, average E/e' >14, and LAVi >34 mL/m².

Tricuspid regurgitation (TR) velocity >2.8 m/s is the fourth criterion used to screen for elevated LV filling pressure.

If two or fewer of the four criteria are abnormal, diastolic function is normal; if more than half (three or four) are abnormal, diastolic dysfunction is present.

Grade I diastolic dysfunction (impaired relaxation) is defined by E/A ≤0.8 with E velocity ≤50 cm/s and normal LA pressure.

Grade III diastolic dysfunction (restrictive filling) is defined by E/A ≥2, reflecting markedly elevated LA pressure.

Last updated: July 2026

The Four Screening Variables

The 2016 ASE/EACVI guideline (Nagueh et al.) streamlined diastolic function assessment in patients with normal LV ejection fraction and no myocardial disease into four measurable variables, each with a fixed abnormal cutoff:

Variable Abnormal threshold
Septal e′ (tissue Doppler) < 7 cm/s
Lateral e′ (tissue Doppler) < 10 cm/s
Average E/e′ ratio (septal + lateral) > 14
LA volume index (LAVi) > 34 mL/m²
Peak TR velocity > 2.8 m/s

Note that the average E/e′ ratio combines septal and lateral e′ measurements; this average — not either value alone — is compared to the 14 cutoff. Each of the five rows functions as one of the four screening criteria (e′ contributes as a single criterion via its septal/lateral cutoffs, alongside average E/e′, LAVi, and TR velocity).

Step 1: Is Diastolic Function Normal or Abnormal?

In a patient with normal LVEF, count how many of the four criteria (e′, average E/e′, LAVi, TR velocity) are abnormal:

0 or 1 abnormal → diastolic function is normal
Exactly 2 of 4 abnormal (50%) → study is indeterminate
More than 50% abnormal (3 or 4 of 4) → diastolic dysfunction is present , and the exam proceeds to grading

This binary screening step deliberately limits the variables considered to reduce the ambiguity of the older, more complex 2009 algorithm, making the four-variable rule the most heavily tested piece of this topic.

Step 2: Grading Diastolic Dysfunction (Grades I–III)

Once diastolic dysfunction is established (or in patients with reduced EF or known myocardial disease, where grading is applied directly), the mitral inflow E/A ratio and E velocity become the primary grading tool, supported by the same three ancillary criteria (average E/e′ >14, LAVi >34 mL/m², TR velocity >2.8 m/s) used above.

Grade Pattern Key criteria LA pressure
Grade I Impaired relaxation E/A ≤ 0.8 and E velocity ≤ 50 cm/s Normal

Grade II Pseudonormal E/A 0.8–2 (or E/A ≤0.8 with E >50 cm/s), with ≥2 of 3 supportive criteria positive Elevated

Grade III Restrictive filling E/A ≥ 2 Markedly elevated

A few working rules simplify this table for exam purposes:

An E/A ratio ≥ 2 is restrictive physiology ( Grade III ) regardless of the supportive criteria — this is the single most memorable cutoff in diastolic grading.

An E/A ratio ≤ 0.8 with a low E velocity (≤50 cm/s) is classic Grade I impaired relaxation with normal filling pressure.

An E/A ratio in the 0.8–2 "gray zone" (or a low E/A with an elevated E velocity) requires the three supportive criteria (average E/e′, LAVi, TR velocity) to distinguish normal aging patterns from Grade II pseudonormal filling — if at least two of the three supportive criteria are positive, filling pressure is considered elevated and the pattern is graded Grade II.

Why These Variables Were Chosen

Each variable captures a different physiologic signal. e′ (early diastolic tissue Doppler velocity at the septal or lateral mitral annulus) reflects myocardial relaxation and falls with age and with intrinsic diastolic dysfunction, largely independent of preload. E/e′ combines the transmitral E velocity (preload- and relaxation-dependent) with e′ (relaxation-dependent) to estimate LV filling pressure — a high E relative to a low e′ suggests the high E velocity is being driven by elevated LA pressure rather than normal relaxation. LAVi integrates the chronic hemodynamic burden on the atrium over time, making it a marker of chronicity rather than an instantaneous pressure measurement. TR velocity , via the simplified Bernoulli equation, estimates RV systolic pressure, which typically rises when LA pressure is chronically elevated and transmitted backward through the pulmonary circulation.

Supporting Doppler Signs

Beyond the four core screening variables, several additional Doppler findings reinforce a grade once assigned rather than replace the primary criteria. E-wave deceleration time (DT) shortens as filling pressure rises and LA-to-LV pressure equalizes more rapidly; a markedly shortened DT accompanies restrictive (Grade III) physiology, while a prolonged DT is typical of impaired relaxation (Grade I). Pulmonary vein flow — specifically a reduced systolic-to-diastolic (S/D) filling fraction and a prolonged pulmonary vein atrial-reversal (Ar) duration compared with mitral A-wave duration — supports elevated LA pressure in equivocal cases. The Valsalva maneuver can help unmask pseudonormal (Grade II) filling by transiently reducing preload: a true pseudonormal pattern reverts toward a Grade I (impaired relaxation) pattern during the strain phase, while normal diastolic function does not meaningfully change.

Exam Application

AE exam items in this area commonly present a table or vignette of raw values — septal and lateral e′, mitral E and A velocities, LAVi, and TR velocity — and ask the candidate to either (1) determine whether diastolic function is normal, indeterminate, or abnormal using the four-variable screen, or (2) assign a specific grade (I, II, or III) using the E/A ratio and supportive criteria. The most common wrong answers involve applying the average E/e′ cutoff of >14 to a single (not averaged) e′ value, or forgetting that E/A ≥2 overrides the need to check supportive criteria for Grade III. Because this algorithm assumes normal EF and no significant valve disease, remember that a different, disease-specific approach is required in patients with reduced EF, mitral stenosis, mitral annular calcification, prosthetic mitral valves, or atrial fibrillation, where several of the standard cutoffs are not validated.