Study guide
8.1 Magistrates' Court Trial Procedure
UK Bar — Criminal Litigation, Evidence and Sentencing Exam
Track your progress as you read
Finished sections get a check mark.
1 Chapter 1: Introduction & BSB Assessment Overview
1.1 BSB Centralised Assessment Structure & Regulations 1.2 Overriding Objective & Court Structure 1.3 Classification of Offences, Court Jurisdiction & Funding
2 Chapter 2: Commencing Proceedings, Charges & Allocation
2.1 Commencing Proceedings & Police Station Procedure 2.2 First Hearing & Classification of Offences 2.3 Allocation and Mode of Trial 2.4 Sending for Trial & Committal for Sentence 2.5 Youth Court & Special Allocation Rules 2.6 Sentencing Powers of the Youth Court
3 Chapter 3: Bail, Remand & Case Management
3.1 Right to Bail & Statutory Exceptions 3.2 Bail Conditions, Breach & Appeals 3.3 Remands, Adjournments & Custody Time Limits 3.4 Case Management & Pre-Trial Hearings 3.5 Prosecution & Defence Disclosure
4 Chapter 4: Indictments & Preparation for Trial in the Crown Court
4.1 The Indictment: Form, Content, Time Limits & Specimen Counts 4.2 Joinder, Severance, Amendment & Voluntary Bills 4.3 Arraignment, Pleas & Change of Plea 4.4 PTPH, Applications to Dismiss & Offering No Evidence
5 Chapter 5: Criminal Evidence — General Principles & PACE Exclusions
5.1 Preliminary Evidential Matters: Relevance, Admissibility & Tribunals 5.2 Burden and Standard of Proof & Presumptions 5.3 Confession Evidence & Mandatory Exclusion 5.4 Discretionary Exclusion of Unfair Evidence 5.5 Inferences from Silence
6 Chapter 6: Special Evidentiary Rules — Hearsay, Character & Identification
6.1 Hearsay Evidence & The Four Gateways 6.2 Hearsay Safeguards, Multiple Hearsay & Procedure 6.3 Defendant Bad Character Evidence 6.4 Non-Defendant Bad Character & Co-Defendant Character 6.5 Good Character, Proof of Convictions & Bad Character Procedure 6.6 Visual Identification & Turnbull Guidelines
7 Chapter 7: Witnesses, Privilege & Opinion Evidence
7.1 Witness Competence, Compellability & Special Measures 7.2 Oaths, Affirmations & Compelling Witness Attendance 7.3 Examination in Chief: Leading Questions, Memory Refreshing & Hostile Witnesses 7.4 Cross-Examination, Previous Inconsistent Statements & Re-Examination 7.5 Opinion Evidence & Expert Witnesses 7.6 Privilege, Public Interest Immunity & Immunity
8 Chapter 8: Trial Procedure in the Magistrates' Court & Crown Court
8.1 Magistrates' Court Trial Procedure 8.2 Summary Trial: Pre-Trial Rulings, Absence & Abuse of Process 8.3 Crown Court Trial Procedure 8.4 Jury Trial: Absence, Unrepresented Defendants & Abuse of Process 8.5 Speeches, Summing Up & Verdicts
9 Chapter 9: Sentencing Framework & Guidelines
9.1 Sentencing Framework, Principles & Procedure 9.2 Seriousness, Guilty Plea Reduction, Aggravation & Mitigation 9.3 Sentencing Procedure: Newton Hearings, Reports & Goodyear Indications 9.4 Custodial Sentences, Suspension & Release 9.5 Mandatory & Minimum Custodial Sentences 9.6 Community Orders, Fines & Discharges 9.7 Ancillary Orders, Costs & Dangerous Offenders
10 Chapter 10: Appeals & Post-Trial Remedies
10.1 Appeals from the Magistrates' Court (Crown Court & High Court Case Stated) 10.2 Rectifying Mistakes, Case Stated & Judicial Review 10.3 Crown Court Appeals (Court of Appeal Criminal Division & Supreme Court) 10.4 CACD Procedure: Rectification, Leave, Renewal, Loss of Time & Fresh Evidence 10.5 Prosecution Appeals, Attorney General's References & the CCRC
8.1 Magistrates' Court Trial Procedure
Key Takeaways Explain This Topic AI
Summary trials in the Magistrates' Court are governed by Criminal Procedure Rules (CrimPR) Part 24 and heard by either a bench of lay magistrates (advised by a Justices' Legal Adviser) or a single District Judge (Magistrates' Courts).
A submission of no case to answer at the close of the prosecution case is governed by the two-limb test in R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039.
The defence always has the right to make a closing speech, whereas the prosecution is entitled to a closing speech only if the defence calls witness evidence as to fact (other than the defendant) or on a point of law.
Under CrimPR 24.3(5), the Magistrates' Court has a mandatory statutory duty to deliver a verdict in open court and state sufficient reasons for its decision.
The Justices' Legal Adviser provides independent legal advice to lay magistrates on questions of law, evidence, and procedure, but must take no part in deciding questions of fact.
Last updated: August 2026
8.1 Magistrates' Court Trial Procedure
Summary trials in the Magistrates' Court determine criminal liability for summary-only offences and either-way offences allocated for summary trial. Procedure in the Magistrates' Court is governed strictly by Criminal Procedure Rules (CrimPR) Part 24 . Unlike Crown Court trials, summary trials operate without a jury: the tribunal of fact and law is combined into a single bench consisting either of a panel of lay magistrates (typically three lay justices) or a single District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) (DJ(MC)) .
- 1. Constitution of the Bench & The Role of the Legal Adviser
- The Bench
Lay Magistrates (Justices of the Peace) : Unsalaried community members who sit as a panel of three (or occasionally two). They act as judges of both fact and law.
District Judge (Magistrates' Courts) : A legally qualified full-time judge who sits alone and exercises all powers of a full bench of lay justices.
The Role of the Justices' Legal Adviser (Legal Adviser / Justices' Clerk)
Under CrimPR 24.15 and the Declaration of Practice Directions (Magistrates' Courts: Legal Advisers) , the Justices' Legal Adviser plays a vital statutory role when lay magistrates preside:
Powers & Functions : The Legal Adviser provides independent advice to the bench on questions of law, evidentiary admissibility, procedural rules, and sentencing guidelines. The Legal Adviser also assists the lay bench in formulating and drafting their reasons for verdict.
Strict Limits : The Legal Adviser must not participate in finding facts or deciding guilt. The bench retires to the retiring room alone to deliberate; if the Legal Adviser is recalled to clarify a point of law during deliberations, that advice must be given or repeated in open court in the presence of prosecution and defence representatives.
2. Order of Proceedings & Evidentiary Presentation (CrimPR Part 24)
The structured order of a summary trial under CrimPR 24.3 proceeds as follows:
Plea and Allocation Confirmation : The court clerk reads the charges and confirms the defendant's name and not guilty plea.
Prosecution Opening Speech : Prosecution counsel or solicitor makes an opening address to outline the summary of facts, the core legal issues, and the evidence the Crown intends to introduce (CrimPR 24.3(2)).
Prosecution Case & Witness Evidence :
Prosecution witnesses are called, sworn/affirmed, and subjected to examination-in-chief , cross-examination by defence, and re-examination .
Written witness statements under Section 9 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 (CJA 1967) and formal admissions of agreed facts under Section 10 CJA 1967 are read aloud or summarized into the record.
Close of Prosecution Case : The prosecution formally closes its evidence.
3. Submission of No Case to Answer: The Galbraith Test in Summary Trials
At the close of the prosecution case, defence counsel may submit that there is no case to answer to request an immediate dismissal of the charge.
The Galbraith Test ( R v Galbraith [1981] 1 WLR 1039)
In summary trials, the magistrates or District Judge apply the identical two-limb test formulated in Galbraith :
Limb 1 : There is no evidence that the crime alleged has been committed by the defendant (e.g. an essential statutory element of the offence is completely unproven).
Limb 2 : There is some evidence, but it is of a tenuous or weak character (for example, owing to inherent inconsistencies or weakness in identification), such that a properly directed tribunal of fact could not properly convict upon it.
Application in Summary Proceedings
When evaluating a submission under Limb 2 in the Magistrates' Court, the bench must assess the quality of the prosecution evidence taken at its highest. If the prosecution evidence, taken at its highest, is such that a reasonable bench could convict, the submission must be rejected and the trial must proceed to the defence case. If the submission succeeds under either limb, the bench dismisses the charge and acquits the defendant.
- 4. Speeches, Verdicts & Mandatory Duty to Give Reasons
- The Defence Case & Adverse Inferences
Following an unsuccessful submission of no case to answer, the defence opens its case:
Opening Speech Restriction : In summary trials, the defence has no right to make an opening speech unless the case involves exceptionally complex legal or factual issues and the court grants leave.
Defendant Testimony & CJPOA s.35 : The defendant is called to testify first among defence witnesses. If the defendant chooses not to testify without reasonable cause, the court may draw proper adverse inferences under Section 35 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 (CJPOA 1994) .
Defence Witness Evidence : Defence witnesses are called, examined-in-chief, cross-examined by the prosecution, and re-examined.
Rules on Closing Speeches (CrimPR 24.3(3))
Closing speeches in summary trials are subject to strict statutory rules:
Defence Closing Speech : The defence always has the right to make a closing speech (CrimPR 24.3(3)(b)). This ensures the defendant gets the final word before the bench deliberates.
Prosecution Closing Speech : The prosecution is entitled to make a closing speech ONLY IF :
The defence has called witness evidence as to factual matters other than the defendant themselves; OR
The court grants permission on a point of law.
If the only defence evidence was the testimony of the defendant, the prosecution is barred from giving a closing speech.
Deliberations, Verdict & Mandatory Statutory Reasons
Deliberation : The magistrates retire to consider their verdict in private. The verdict may be unanimous or by a simple majority vote among the three justices.
Delivery of Verdict : The bench returns to open court, and the presiding magistrate or DJ(MC) announces the verdict of Guilty or Not Guilty .
Mandatory Duty to Give Reasons : Under CrimPR 24.3(5) (reflecting ECHR Article 6 requirements in R v Chichester Justices ex p Collins [1982] 1 WLR 334), when pronouncing a verdict, the court must state sufficient reasons for its decision :
Guilty Verdict : The court must explain which factual allegations were accepted, how disputed legal issues were resolved, and why the prosecution satisfied the standard of proof beyond reasonable doubt.
Not Guilty Verdict : The court must provide a brief summary of reasons explaining why reasonable doubt remained or why defence evidence was accepted.
Summary of Magistrates' Court Trial Procedure
Stage Statutory Rule / CrimPR Operating Rule & Requirements Legal Effect / Restrictions
Bench Advice CrimPR 24.15 Legal Adviser advises lay bench on law and procedure. Must not participate in fact-finding or decision on guilt.
Prosecution Case CrimPR 24.3(2) Opening speech, witness evidence, s.9 statements, s.10 facts. Crown must establish prima facie case on all elements.
No Case Submission R v Galbraith [1981] Submission evaluated under Limb 1 (no evidence) or Limb 2 (tenuous evidence). If successful, charge dismissed immediately; if failed, defence case begins.
Defence Evidence CJPOA 1994 s.35 Defendant testifies first; non-testimony permits adverse inference. Defence witness evidence called and cross-examined.
Closing Speeches CrimPR 24.3(3) Defence always gets final closing speech; Prosecution restricted. Prosecution gets closing speech ONLY if non-defendant factual witnesses called.
Verdict & Reasons CrimPR 24.3(5) Delivered in open court; mandatory duty to give factual/legal reasons. Failure to state adequate reasons constitutes an appealable error of law.